...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Geology >Comparative spatial predictions of the locations of soil-rock interface
【24h】

Comparative spatial predictions of the locations of soil-rock interface

机译:土岩界面位置的比较空间预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The location of soil-rock interfaces (SRIs) may significantly affect the underground construction works, including the design of underground geotechnical structures. The prediction of the location of SRI using limited borehole data is a challenging task. To address this challenge, this paper presents a comparison study of four methods for spatially predicting the SRI elevation, namely the polynomial regression, spline interpolation, one-dimensional spline regression, and a Bayesian-based conditional random field. The consistencies, prediction accuracies, patterns of the predicted curves, and prediction uncertainties for various methods are evaluated. Borehole data from two sites in Singapore are used in the comparative study. The results show that the spline interpolation method produces the least consistent estimation of SRI profiles. The spline interpolation method also has lower prediction accuracies than the other three methods and cannot provide any information regarding the prediction uncertainty. The spatial trend of the geological interface cannot be captured by the polynomial regression method with a relatively high (i.e., 10) order of the polynomial when faults and folds exist. Advantages of the spline regression method over the conditional random field methods include that (i) it provides a clear and explicit spatial trend of the SRI, which well reflects the geological complexity of the sites; (ii) it avoids the cumbersome estimation of random field parametric values, which is a challenging task under the condition of limited data; and (iii) it can differentiate the zones with different prediction accuracies, which cannot be accomplished by the conditional random field method due to limited data. To sum up, the spline regression method produces a simpler and more informative curve of the SRI than the other three methods and thereby is useful as it can guide site investigations to be carried out at geologically uncertain areas to reduce risks, especially for underground construction projects
机译:土壤 - 岩石界面(SRIS)的位置可能会显着影响地下建筑工程,包括地下岩土结构的设计。使用有限钻孔数据的SRI位置预测是一个具有挑战性的任务。为了解决这一挑战,本文提出了四种方法对空间预测的四种方法进行了比较研究,即多项式回归,花键内插,一维样条回归和基于贝叶斯的条件随机场。评估常规,预测准确性,预测曲线的模式,以及用于各种方法的预测不确定性。来自新加坡两个地点的钻孔数据用于比较研究。结果表明,花键内插方法产生了SRI简档的最低一致估计。花键内插方法也具有比其他三种方法更低的预测精度,并且不能提供关于预测不确定性的任何信息。在存在故障和折叠时,多项式回归方法不能通过多项式回归方法捕获地质界面的空间趋势。条件随机现场方法的样条回归方法的优点包括:(i)它提供了SRI的清晰明确的空间趋势,这很好地反映了场地的地质复杂性; (ii)它避免了随机场参数值的麻烦估计,这是在有限数据条件下的具有挑战性的任务; (iii)它可以区分具有不同预测精度的区域,这不能通过有限的数据而通过条件随机场方法来实现。总而言之,花键回归方法产生比其他三种方法更简单,更丰富的曲线,从而可用于指导在地质不确定区域进行现场调查,以降低风险,特别是对于地下建设项目

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号