...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Limited diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures
【24h】

Limited diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures

机译:单次操作员胆管镜检查的有限诊断准确性和临床影响不确定胆道狭窄

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Single-operator peroral cholangioscopy (sPOCS) is considered a valuable diagnostic modality for indeterminate biliary strictures. Nevertheless, studies show large variation in its characteristics and measures of diagnostic accuracy. Our aim was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of sPOCS visual assessment and targeted biopsies for indeterminate biliary strictures. Additional aims were: estimation of the clinical impact of sPOCS and comparison of diagnostic accuracy with brush cytology. Methods A retrospective single-center study of adult patients who underwent sPOCS for indeterminate biliary strictures was performed. Diagnostic accuracy was defined as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The clinical impact of sPOCS was assessed by review of medical records, and classified according to its influence on patient management. Results 80 patients were included, with 40 % having primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Prior ERCP was performed in 88 %, with removal of a biliary stent prior to sPOCS in 55 %. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for sPOCS visual impression and targeted biopsies were 64 %, 62 %, 41 %, and 84 %, and 15 %, 65 %, 75 %, and 69 %, respectively. The clinical impact of sPOCS was limited; outcome changed management in 17 % of patients. Sequential brush cytology sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 47 %, 95 %, 80 %, and 83 %. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of sPOCS for indeterminate biliary strictures was found to be inferior to brush cytology, with a low impact on patient management. These findings are obtained from a select patient population with a high prevalence of PSC and plastic stents in situ prior to sPOCS.
机译:背景技术单次操作员对胆管透视(SPOC)被认为是不确定胆道狭窄的有价值的诊断方式。尽管如此,研究表明其特点和诊断准确度的特点变化。我们的目的是估算SPOCS视觉评估和针对性活组织检查对于不确定的胆道狭窄的诊断准确性。额外的目的是:估计SPOC的临床影响以及用刷子细胞学进行诊断准确性的比较。方法采取回顾性单中心研究,对患有不确定胆量狭窄进行孢子的成年患者。诊断准确度被定义为灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和负预测值(NPV)。 SPOCS的临床影响通过审查医疗记录来评估,并根据其对患者管理的影响分类。结果包括80名患者,具有40%的原发性胆管炎(PSC)。先前的ERCP以88%进行,在55%之前除去刺激前的胆道支架。 Spocs视觉印象和靶向活组织检查的敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为64%,62%,41%和84%,共15%,65%,75%和69%。 SPOCS的临床影响有限;成果在17%的患者中改变了管理。顺序刷子细胞学敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV为47%,95%,80%和83%。结论发现患有不确定胆量狭窄的SPOCs的诊断准确性较差,对血液管理影响低。这些发现是从SPOC之前的PSC和塑料支架的选择患者患病率高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号