...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:用于胃肠道出血的范围内夹子的功效和安全性:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) has been increasingly utilized for the management of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Limited efficacy data are currently available from large-scale studies. Methods An electronic database search was conducted for eligible articles using OTSCs for hemostasis in GI bleeding. The primary outcome was the rate of definitive hemostasis after primary hemostasis and without rebleeding at follow-up.Secondary outcomes were: primary technical success, primary clinical success, rebleeding, and failure rates. Pooled rates were expressed as proportions of patients with events over total patients, 95% confidence limits (CI) with heterogeneity, and P values of<0.05 for significance. Results A total of 21 studies (n=851) were analyzed (62.2% males), with a median patient age of 69.7 years. The definitive hemostasis rate was 87.8% (95%CI 83.7%-92%) after a median follow-up of 56 days. The OTSC was successfully deployed in 97.8% of patients (95%CI 96.7%-98.9%) and the primary clinical success rate was 96.6% (95%CI 95.1%-98.2%). Rebleeding was seen in 10.3% of patients (95%CI 6.5%-14.1%). The failure rate of OTSCs was 9% (95%CI 5.2%-12.8%) when used as first-line treatment and 26% (95%CI 16.1%-36.0%) when used as second-line treatment. Conclusion This systematic review showed high rates of definitive hemostasis, technical success, and clinical success, along with low rebleeding rates when OTSCs were used for the treatment of GI bleeding. The lack of randomized controlled trials of OTSC vs. other therapies makes comparison with conventional treatment difficult.
机译:背景技术越来越多地用于管理胃肠道(GI)出血的管理。目前可以从大型研究中获得有限的疗效数据。方法使用OTSCS在GI出血中进行止血的符合条件的文章进行电子数据库搜索。主要结果是原发性止血后明确止血的速率,并且在随访时没有再用。等级成果是:初级技术成功,初级临床成功,重燃和失败利率。汇总利率被表达为对总患者事件的患者的比例,95%的置骨限制(CI)具有异质性,并且P值为<0.05的重要性。结果共分析了21项研究(N = 851)(62.2%),中位数患者年龄为69.7岁。在56天的中位随访后,最终止血率为87.8%(95%CI 83.7%-92%)。 OTSC成功部署于97.8%的患者(95%CI 96.7%-98.9%),主要临床成功率为96.6%(95%CI 95.1%-98.2%)。在10.3%的患者中看到Rebleeding(95%CI 6.5%-14.1%)。当用作二线治疗时,当用作一线治疗时,OTSCs的失败率为9%(95%CI 5.2%-12.8%),当用作二线治疗时26%(95%CI 16.1%-36.0%)。结论这种系统综述显示出明确的止血,技术成功和临床成功的高率,随着OTSCS用于治疗GI出血的情况下,较低的再释放率。缺乏OTSC与其他疗法的随机对照试验使得与常规治疗难以进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号