首页> 外文期刊>Earth-Science Reviews: The International Geological Journal Bridging the Gap between Research Articles and Textbooks >Did a meta-analysis accurately estimate the temporal trends of carbon stock change after grazing exclusion in China's grasslands? A comment on 'Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration in China's grassland,' by Deng et al. (2017)
【24h】

Did a meta-analysis accurately estimate the temporal trends of carbon stock change after grazing exclusion in China's grasslands? A comment on 'Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration in China's grassland,' by Deng et al. (2017)

机译:在中国草地放牧后,是否准确地估计了碳股票变化的时间趋势? Deng等人的“放牧排除在中国草原上碳封存的影响”评述。 (2017)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The temporal pattern of carbon stock changes in response to grazing exclusion (GE) is important for grassland ecosystem restoration policy. The carbon stock change rate is the quotient computed by dividing the change in carbon stock after GE by GE duration. We modeled varying carbon stock change rates with GE durations based on data from a meta-analysis by Deng et al. (2017). We found that the close relationship between the carbon stock change rate and GE duration was mostly driven by GE duration in the denominator, rather than by carbon stock changes in the numerator. We argue that Deng et al.'s conclusion that the exponential decay trend varies with GE duration was inaccurate and that it was misleading to suggest there is a temporal pattern to carbon stock changes that is associated with GE duration. Their model may further encourage GE-based policy that includes fencing as a major practice of grassland restoration. However, this practice yields clearly negative impacts on herders' livelihoods, animal husbandry, pastoral social development and wildlife protection.
机译:碳股票响应于放牧排除(GE)的时间模式对草原生态系统恢复政策很重要。碳股票变化率是通过在GE持续时间划分GE之后的碳储存变化来计算的商。基于DENG等人的META分析的数据,我们建模不同的碳股票变化率与GE持续时间。 (2017)。我们发现,碳股票变化率和GE持续时间之间的密切关系主要是由分母在分母中的GE持续时间驱动,而不是通过分子的碳库变化。我们认为Deng等人的结论是,指数衰减趋势随着GE持续时间而变化不准确,并且误导性呈现出与GE持续时间相关的碳储存变化存在时间模式。他们的模型可能进一步鼓励基于GE的政策,包括击剑作为草原恢复的主要实践。然而,这种做法对牧民的生计,畜牧业,牧师社会发育和野生动物保护产生了显着的负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号