...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth-Science Reviews: The International Geological Journal Bridging the Gap between Research Articles and Textbooks >Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from 'matters of fact' to 'matters of concern'
【24h】

Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from 'matters of fact' to 'matters of concern'

机译:向公众沟通有争议的地球科学:从“事实的事项”转移到“关注事项”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Geological issues are increasingly intruding on the everyday lives of ordinary people. Whether it is the onshore extraction of oil and gas, the subsurface injection of waters for geothermal power or the deep storage of waste products, communities across the world are being confronted with controversial geological interventions beneath their backyards. Communicating these complex scientific and technical issues is made more challenging by the general public's unfamiliarity with the geological realm. Cognitive studies confirm a cultural dissonance with the subsurface and highlight lay anxieties about tampering with nature. In addressing those concerns, factual information is argued to be subordinate to values and beliefs in shaping public perspectives on contested geoscientific issues. In this context, scientists' attention to technical accuracy and their emphasis on professional consensus may do little to influence multiple publics whose worries instead root into their sense of place, trust and governance, as well as equity and ethics. With a growing recognition that it is social rather than technical factors that stir public unease and fuel community outrage, geoscientists need to develop new strategies to engage dissonant publics, underpinned by a culture change in geocommunication from conveying 'matters of fact' to brokering 'matters of concern'.
机译:地质问题越来越闯入普通人的日常生活。无论是石油和天然气的陆上提取,水域地下注射水域的水域还是废物的深层储存,世界各地的社区都面临着他们的后院下面的争议地质干预。沟通这些复杂的科学和技术问题是普通公众对地质领域的不熟悉的更具挑战性。认知研究证实了与地下的文化解剖,并突出了关于篡改性质的焦虑。在解决这些问题的情况下,事实信息被认为是从属于塑造有争议的地球科学问题的公众观点的价值观和信念。在这种情况下,科学家对技术准确性的关注及其对专业共识的重视可能会影响多个公众,其担忧迫切地侵入他们的地方,信任和治理,以及股权和伦理。随着越来越高的认可,它是社会而不是激起公共秩序和燃料社区愤怒的技术因素,地球科学家需要制定新的战略,以开展异议的公众,通过传达“事实”对经纪人的“事实”的“事项”的文化变化为基础。关注'。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号