...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of dermatology >Syringes versus Chinese cups in harvesting suction‐induced blister graft: a randomized split‐body study
【24h】

Syringes versus Chinese cups in harvesting suction‐induced blister graft: a randomized split‐body study

机译:注射器与收获吸入引起的泡罩移植物的中药杯:随机分裂体研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Suction blister grafting ( SBG ) is a technique where the pigmented epidermis is harvested from the donor site by induction of a blister using different suction methods as syringes, Chinese cups, suction device, etc. However, pain, time consumption, incomplete blister formation, and failure of blister development are the main limitations. Objective To compare between cups and syringes of similar diameter in inducing suction blisters. Patients and methods In 30 patients with stable nonsegmental vitiligo, 2‐cm‐diameter (20 ml) syringe was applied on the anterolateral aspect of one thigh and a 2‐cm‐diameter cup on the corresponding site of the other thigh where right and left sides were chosen randomly. Patients were observed untill complete blister development or for a maximum of 3 hours. Suction blister induction time ( SBIT ) and the blister diameter were recorded for each patient. Pain during the process of induction was evaluated. Results Incomplete blister development was noted in 9 out of 30 (30%) with 2 cm syringes and 6 out of 30 (20%) with the similar diameter cups with no significant difference ( P = 0.49). No significant difference was found between SBIT induced by the 2 cm syringes and the similar size cups (101.17 ± 68.14 minutes, 98 ± 56.84 minutes, respectively) ( P = 0.85). Meanwhile, blister diameter induced by either syringe or cup was not significantly different ( P = 0.37). Anesthesia was for short duration with xylocaine, and pain was intolerable in both sides in the first seven patients. A combination of xylocaine and bupivacaine was used with prolonged loss of pain in 17 of the remaining 23 patients and tolerable pain in six patients similarly in both sides. Conclusion According to present results, the differences in SIBT , diameter of blisters, and number of complete blister formation induced by either syringes or cups of similar size were not significant. Therefore, whatever the available and feasible technique for the surgeon will be the ideal choice. A combination of xylocaine and bupivacaine is recommended to overcome the accompanying pain of the procedure.
机译:摘要背景抽吸泡罩移植(SBG)是一种通过使用不同抽吸方法作为注射器,中国杯,抽吸装置等诱导泡罩从供体部位收获着色表皮的技术。然而,疼痛,时间消耗,泡罩不完全模塑开发的形成和失败是主要的限制。目的在诱导吸入水疱中的杯子和注射器之间比较。在30例稳定的非末端患者中,在另一个大腿的相应部位的一条大腿和2厘米直径杯的前外侧方面施加2厘米直径(20mL)注射器的患者和方法。侧面被随机选择。观察患者直到完全泡罩发育或最多3小时。为每位患者记录吸入泡罩诱导时间(SBIT)和泡罩直径。评估了诱导过程中的疼痛。结果不完全泡罩发育,其中9种(30%)中的9个(30%),其中2厘米的注射器,其中6分,其中6个(20%),具有类似的直径杯,没有显着差异(P = 0.49)。由2厘米注射器和类似尺寸杯子诱导的Sbit之间没有显着差异(101.17±68.14分钟,分别为98±56.84分钟)(P = 0.85)。同时,注射器或杯子诱导的泡罩直径没有显着差异(p = 0.37)。麻醉是为了短暂的含有Xylocaine的持续时间,在前7名患者的两侧疼痛都无法耐受。 Xylocaine和Bupivacaine的组合用于剩余23名患者中的17例剩余23名患者的延长损失,并且在两侧同样患者耐受性疼痛。结论根据目前的结果,通过注射器或类似尺寸的杯子诱导的肠梗阻,水疱直径和完全泡罩形成数量的差异并不显着。因此,无论外科医生的可用和可行技术将是理想的选择。建议使用Xylocaine和Bupivacaine的组合来克服程序的伴随疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号