...
首页> 外文期刊>Compost Science & Utilization >Differences in a composted animal waste and straw mixture as a function of three compost methods.
【24h】

Differences in a composted animal waste and straw mixture as a function of three compost methods.

机译:堆肥动物粪便和秸秆混合物的差异是三种堆肥方法的函数。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Spatial differences in the physical and chemical characteristics of composted organic matter are strongly influenced by the composting method. We examined a traditional turned windrow (TW) treatment and two static passively aerated treatments (uncovered (SPA-U) and covered (SPA-C)) to determine spatial and temporal differences within and between treatments during composting of an animal waste-straw mixture. Temperature, moisture content, pH, respiration rate, C:N, mineral nitrogen and 15N were measured at three depths over a period of 176 days. All treatments met composting temperature criteria established by US EPA regulation 503. Covering piles for a short period elevated temperatures and may enhance thermal destruction of pathogens on and near the surface layer. The final C:N ratio was similar (10-11) between treatments and total C loss ranged from 40-45%. Total N concentrations increased about 20% during composting and there was no measurable loss of nitrogen from any treatments. SPA treatments tended to have a greater concentration of mineral nitrogen than the turned treatment (SPA-C > SPA-U > TW). For all treatments, pH was negatively correlated with mineral nitrogen suggesting retention of volatile ammonia (as ammonium) and subsequent nitrification. A small enrichment of 15N in the SPA treatments suggests some loss of nitrogen through ammonia volatilization and denitrification with greater enrichment (or loss of volatile N) from the TW treatment. Measuring microbial respiration, as a measure of labile organic matter and compost stability, showed differences within and between compost methods and may result from differences in microbial communities and nitrogen availability. Compared to the TW treatment, compost characteristics were spatially stratified in the SPA treatments and therefore the compost would require mixing prior to application. Results from this study will assist producers in optimizing their composting operations and the quality of the compost produced..
机译:堆肥方法会严重影响堆肥有机物的理化特性的空间差异。我们研究了传统的翻堆杂草处理(TW)和两种静态的被动曝气处理(未覆盖(SPA-U)和有盖曝气(SPA-C)),以确定动物粪便与稻草混合物堆肥过程中以及处理之间的时空差异。 。在176天的三个深度测量温度,水分,pH,呼吸速率,C:N,矿质氮和15N。所有处理均符合美国EPA法规503确立的堆肥温度标准。在短时间内升高温度覆盖堆肥,可能会增强对表层及其附近病原体的热破坏。处理之间的最终C:N比相似(10-11),总C损失范围为40-45%。在堆肥过程中,总氮浓度增加了约20%,并且任何处理都没有可测量的氮损失。 SPA处理的矿质氮浓度往往比翻车处理高(SPA-C> SPA-U> TW)。对于所有处理,pH值与矿质氮呈负相关,表明保留了挥发性氨(如铵)并随后硝化。 SPA处理中少量的15N富集表明通过TW的氨富集和反硝化,氮会损失一些,而TW处理中会富集更多(或挥发性氮)。微生物呼吸的测量,作为衡量不稳定有机物和堆肥稳定性的一种方法,显示了堆肥方法之间以及堆肥方法之间的差异,这可能是由于微生物群落和氮素利用率的差异所致。与TW处理相比,在SPA处理中堆肥的特征在空间上是分层的,因此堆肥在施用前需要混合。这项研究的结果将帮助生产者优化堆肥操作和生产堆肥的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号