首页> 外文期刊>Ecology, Environment and Conservation >Bee sampling efficiencies of three different methods in a forested ecosystem in Southern West Bengal, India: A comparative study
【24h】

Bee sampling efficiencies of three different methods in a forested ecosystem in Southern West Bengal, India: A comparative study

机译:印度西孟加拉邦南部森林生态系统中三种不同方法的蜜蜂采样效率:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The study of bees has necessitated the evolution of several different techniques of sampling bees from the wild, which can be broadly classified into active and passive sampling methods. Traditionally, active sampling using sweep nets and passive sampling involving the use of several passive traps, viz., vane, pan/bowl, malaise etc., have long been in application. Adapting to the conditions of the ecosystems under study, passive sampling methods have been modified and improved upon in various innovative ways. The present study compares the sampling efficiencies of nets, bowls, and one such innovative height-adjustable modification of passive bowl trapping in sampling bees in a forested ecosystem in West Midnapore district of West Bengal, India. A total of 228 bees representing 13 species and 2 families were caught by the three methods over three seasons spanning one year following monthly sampling efforts. Results revealed that there was a significant interaction between methods and seasons on theaverage number of bees sampled. Different sampling methods also differed in the proportions of the various nesting guilds of bees that could be sampled by them. Bee assemblages sampled by the three methods displayed varying ecological indices, includingsignificantly different Shannon H2. This first-of-its-kind study in this ecosystem concludes that a combination of different sampling methods is necessary for comprehensive sampling of native bee fauna in similar forested habitats prevalent across lateritic south West Bengal, India.
机译:蜜蜂的研究已经需要从野外的采样蜜蜂的几种不同技术的演变,这可以广泛地分为主动和无源抽样方法。传统上,使用扫描网和被动采样的主动采样涉及使用多个被动陷阱,viz,叶片,锅/碗,恶性等,长期以来一直在应用中。适应研究的生态系统的条件,被动采样方法以各种创新方式进行了修改和改善。本研究比较了印度西孟加拉邦西区西区森林生态系统中的采样蜜蜂在森林生态系统中的被动碗捕获的采样效率的采样效率。在每月抽样努力之后的三个季节超过三季的三种方法中,共有228个蜜蜂被占据了三种方法。结果表明,在抽样的蜜蜂数量之间的方法和季节之间存在显着的相互作用。不同的采样方法也不同于可以由它们采样的蜜蜂的各种嵌套公会的比例不同。由三种方法采样的蜜蜂组装显示不同的生态指数,包括不同的Shannon H2。这种生态系统中的初步研究得出结论,不同的采样方法的组合对于当地人养殖者在印度后侧孟加拉州普遍普遍存在的植物栖息地的综合养殖人栖息地的综合抽样是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号