...
首页> 外文期刊>EDPACS: The EDP audit, control and security newsletter >BOARDS, CEOS, AND CFOS NEED TO DEMAND A LOT MORE FROM INTERNAL AUDIT AND RISK GROUPS
【24h】

BOARDS, CEOS, AND CFOS NEED TO DEMAND A LOT MORE FROM INTERNAL AUDIT AND RISK GROUPS

机译:董事会,首席执行官和CFO需要从内部审计和风险群体需求更多

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Customers of internal audit and risk services, including boards and C-Suite executives, have generally been quite content using process centric metrics like "% of planned audits completed", "completion and maintenance of the company's risk register" and other similar metrics focused on execution of processes. As a general statement, a large percentage of the customers of internal audit and risk management services have been largely apathetic and indifferent. These same customers would absolutely not tolerate sales groups or other line functions that want to be measured largely on process execution, not important end results. This article explores this phenomenon and the evolution of new regulatory expectations for boards and CEOS and the release of COSO ERM during the summer of 2017. After exploring the puzzling evolution of metrics for risk groups and internal audit functions the author proposes objective centric ERM and internal audit as a better way forward for risk specialists and internal auditors, an approach that is better positioned to measure the real contributions made by these functions.
机译:内部审计和风险服务,包括董事会和C-Suite高管的客户通常使用流程为中心的指标,如“百分比已完成”,“公司的风险登记册”,“完成和维护”和其他类似指标集中在一起执行进程。作为一般性声明,内部审计和风险管理服务的大量客户大部分都在很大程度上持续和无动于衷。这些同样的客户绝对不会容忍销售组或其他希望在很大程度上测量的销售组或其他线路功能,而不是重要的最终结果。本文探讨了这一现象和董事会和首席执行官新监管期望的演变和2017年夏季的COSO ERM的发布。探索风险群体指数的令人困惑的演变和内部审计职能后,提议上以中心ERM和内部审核作为风险专家和内部审计员的更好的前进方式,一种更好地定位以衡量这些功能所取得的实际贡献的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号