首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Modelling >Contrasting outcomes of spatially implicit and spatially explicit models of vegetation dynamics in a forest-shrubland mosaic
【24h】

Contrasting outcomes of spatially implicit and spatially explicit models of vegetation dynamics in a forest-shrubland mosaic

机译:森林灌木马赛克植被动力学的空间隐含和空间明确模型的对比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much contemporary ecology emphasises the importance of taking a spatial perspective in linking ecological patterns and processes. However, collecting and analysing spatial data is expensive. Here we compare spatially implicit and spatially explicit versions of a model of successional dynamics in a forest- shrubland mosaic in a mountain-top reserve in New Caledonia. The models are used to (i) understand the circumstances driving change in abundance of forest and shrubland, and (ii) compare the outcomes of spatially explicit and spatially implicit models of the same system. The spatially explicit model is grid-based and uses a spatially implemented 'state-and-transition' approach, with fire spread and seed dispersal the main spatial processes considered. The spatially implicit model is based on a transition matrix approach. TWO alternative transition matrices were constructed, one based on field measurements and the other parameterised using output from the spatially explicit model. Although the averaged dynamics of the two models appear similar, the models make very different qualitative predictions about the landscape. Under the same initial parameter conditions two alternative landscape states emerge from the spatially explicit model; this is not the case for the spatially implicit model. Further, the spatial model produces outcomes much closer to those documented historically and inferred from the palxoecological record. The differences between the non-spatial and spatial models arise because, in this system, fine-scale interactions between landscape pattern and process are drivers of coarser scale dynamics, and such interactions are not included in the spatially implicit model. More generally, in order to understand coarse-scale spatial dynamics it may be important to consider local spatial patterns; spatially explicit models are those most likely to incorporate these. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
机译:当代生态很大,强调了在将生态模式和流程联系起来的空间视角的重要性。但是,收集和分析空间数据是昂贵的。在这里,我们在新喀里多尼亚山顶储备中比较了森林灌木马赛克连续动态模型的空间隐含和空间显式版本。该模型用于(i)了解森林和灌木丰富的驾驶变化的情况,(ii)比较相同系统的空间显式和空间隐式模型的结果。空间显式模型是基于网格的,并使用空间实现的“状态和转换”方法,火灾扩散和种子分散所考虑的主要空间过程。空间隐式模型基于转换矩阵方法。构建两个替代的转换矩阵,一个基于场测量和使用来自空间显式模型的输出的另一个参数化。虽然两种模型的平均动态出现相似,但模型对景观产生了非常不同的定性预测。在相同的初始参数条件下,两个替代横向状态从空间显式模型中出现;这不是空间隐式模型的情况。此外,空间模型产生了更接近历史上并从腭生态记录推断的结果。出现非空间和空间模型之间的差异,因为在该系统中,横向模式和过程之间的微量相互作用是较粗略级别动态的驱动程序,并且这种交互不包括在空间隐式模型中。更一般地,为了了解粗糙度的空间动态,考虑局部空间模式可能是重要的;空间显式模型是最有可能纳入这些的模型。 (c)2007年ELSEVIER B.V保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号