首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >Evaluating the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment to facilitate renewable energy planning and improved decision-making: a South African case study
【24h】

Evaluating the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment to facilitate renewable energy planning and improved decision-making: a South African case study

机译:评估战略环境评估的有效性,促进可再生能源规划和改进决策:南非案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Criteria for the evaluation of the effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) have evolved internationally from the requirement for mere procedural effectiveness, to include criteria such as substantial and incremental effectiveness. This paper provides an overview of the international evolution of effectiveness evaluation for SEA and its parallel progression in South Africa. Within this context, the effectiveness of the two SEA case studies conducted in support of national-scale renewable energy planning in South Africa was reviewed against internationally recognised effectiveness criteria to test their ability to influence decision making for renewable energy projects in the country. The evaluation was informed by the role of the first author as the project director in the case studies. The review found the SEAs to be partially effective, mainly through the introduction of new legislation, processes and systems at the national level that operationalise the outcomes of the SEA. A fundamental limitation emerged in determining whether incremental effectiveness had been achieved as it is too soon to evaluate the effectiveness of the recently promulgated legislation and instruments. The paper builds on previous work on effectiveness evaluations and provides the perspective of an administrative implementer.
机译:评估战略环境评估的有效性(海)的标准从仅仅是程序效率的要求,包括诸如实质性和增量效率等标准。本文概述了海上有效评价的国际演变及其在南非的平行进展。在这方面,在国际公认的有效性标准审查了支持南非国家规模可再生能源规划的两次海上案例研究的有效性,以测试其影响国家可再生能源项目决策的能力。首次提交人作为项目主任在案例研究中的作用得到了评估。该审查发现海洋是部分有效的,主要是通过在国家一级的新立法,流程和系统的推动,这些立法和制度在运作海外的成果。确定是否已经实现了增量效率的基本限制,因为它的效率是以估计最近颁布的立法和文书的有效性。本文以先前的有效性评估为基础,并提供了行政制定者的视角。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号