...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >Passive Roadside Restoration Reduces Management Costs and Fosters Native Habitat
【24h】

Passive Roadside Restoration Reduces Management Costs and Fosters Native Habitat

机译:被动路边恢复降低了管理成本和促进了本地栖息地

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Roadside ecosystems are managed areas adjacent to roads that are undervalued for the ecological functions they provide. Reductions in roadside mowing is a passive restoration approach that can create habitat, lower management costs, and reduce fragmentation, but managers fear reducing mowing will allow invasive plants to proliferate. Our goal was to quantify changes in invasive plant cover due to decreased mowing. We compared plant diversity and percent cover at roadside sites under three types of vegetation management in Rhode Island--Reference (no-mow forested roadsides, n = 5), Restored (reduced mowing plan, n = 5), Mowed (traditional mowing plan, n = 5)--at four spatial scales using Modified-Whittaker vegetation surveys. Reference sites had the highest native species richness at two spatial scales, the lowest introduced species richness at three spatial scales, and the lowest introduced species percent cover. Invasive species diversity and abundance was not affected by mowing treatment. Because we did not observe an increase of invasive or introduced plant species at sites which are transitioning from Mowed to Restored, we recommend roadside managers implement passive roadside restoration wherever possible. Additionally, because Reference sites had significantly higher native plant diversity and lower introduced plant diversity and cover, managers may consider allowing roadsides to continue through the stages of succession and transition to young forests. Alternatively, managers could restore roadsides to varying stages of succession to increase habitat heterogeneity. These kinds of roadside management plans facilitate biodiversity, maintain habitat important for rare and endangered wildlife, can decrease atmospheric CO_2 emissions, and are a cost-effective form of restoration.
机译:路边生态系统是毗邻其提供的生态功能的道路附近的管理区。路边割草的减少是一种被动恢复方法,可以创造栖息地,降低管理成本和减少碎片,但管理人员担心减少割草将允许侵入性植物增殖。我们的目标是量化由于割草减少而导致侵入性植物封面的变化。我们比较了罗德岛三种植被管理的路边地点的植物多样性和百分比 - 参考文献(无割草道,N = 5),修复(减少割草计划,n = 5),修剪(传统割草计划,n = 5) - 在四个空间秤,使用改进的惠特植被调查。参考地点在两个空间尺度下具有最高的原生物种丰富性,最低引入了三个空间尺度的物种丰富性,最低引入的物种百分比盖。侵入物种多样性和丰度不受割草处理的影响。由于我们没有观察到从割草到恢复的地点的入侵或引入植物物种的增加,因此我们建议路边经理在可能的情况下实施被动路边恢复。此外,由于参考地点具有显着提高的本土植物多样性和较低的植物多样性和封面,因此管理人员可能会考虑允许道路持续走向历程和过渡到年轻森林。或者,管理人员可以恢复道路,以改变连续的阶段来增加栖息地异质性。这些道路管理计划促进生物多样性,维持对稀有和濒危野生动物重要的栖息地,可以减少大气的CO_2排放,是一种成本效益的恢复形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号