...
首页> 外文期刊>Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy >'It's not black and white' Public health researchers' and ethics committees' perceptions of engaging research participants online
【24h】

'It's not black and white' Public health researchers' and ethics committees' perceptions of engaging research participants online

机译:“这不是黑白的”公共卫生研究人员“和道德委员会在线参与研究参与者的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose The internet offers an opportunity for researchers to engage participants in research in a cost-effective and timely manner. Yet the use of the internet as a research tool (internet research) comes with a range of ethical concerns, and the rapidly changing online environment poses challenges for both researchers and ethics committees. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the key ethical issues of using the internet to recruit, retain and trace participants in public health research, from the perspectives of researchers and human research ethics committee (HREC) members. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with eight public health researchers and seven HREC members in Australia to explore the key ethical issues of using the internet to engage research participants. Findings The study identified commonalities between researchers and HREC members regarding the utility and ethical complexity of using the internet to recruit, retain and trace research participants. The need for guidance and support regarding internet research, for both groups, was highlighted, as well as the need for flexibility and responsiveness in formal ethical processes. Originality/value This research contributes to the understanding of how the internet is used to engage participants in public health research and the ethical context in which that occurs. Supporting the ethical conduct of internet research will benefit those involved in research, including researchers, HRECs, organisations and research participants.
机译:目的互联网为研究人员提供了以成本效益和及时的方式参与研究人员的机会。然而,互联网作为研究工具(互联网研究)的使用具有一系列道德问题,而且迅速变化的在线环境对研究人员和伦理委员会的挑战构成了挑战。本文的目的是突出使用互联网招聘,留住和追踪公共卫生研究的关键道德问题,从研究人员和人类研究伦理委员会(HREC)成员的角度来看。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了使用半结构化访谈的定性设计,澳大利亚有八个公共卫生研究人员和七名HREC成员探讨使用互联网参与研究参与者的关键道德问题。调查结果研究人员与HREC成员之间的共同点,了解使用互联网招聘,保留和追踪研究参与者的效用和伦理复杂性。对这两个群体的有关互联网研究的指导和支持的需求被突出显示,以及在正式道德过程中需要灵活性和响应性。原创性/价值本研究有助于了解互联网如何用于从事公共卫生研究的参与者以及发生的道德环境。支持互联网研究的道德行为将使参与研究的人员,包括研究人员,HREC,组织和研究参与者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号