...
首页> 外文期刊>International Urology and Nephrology >Are iso-osmolar, as compared to low-osmolar, contrast media cost-effective in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization? An economic analysis
【24h】

Are iso-osmolar, as compared to low-osmolar, contrast media cost-effective in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization? An economic analysis

机译:与低渗透压患者相比,是oso-Osmolar,与低渗透介质在接受心脏导管插入术的患者方面具有成本效益吗? 经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is a prominent complication following cardiac catheterization, though the risk has progressively decreased in recent times with appropriate risk stratification and use of safer contrast agents. Despite data supporting further lowering of risk with the iso-osmolar agent, iodixanol, uptake has lagged, perhaps due to increased upfront cost of this agent. We undertook an economic analysis to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a strategy utilizing iodixanol compared to using a low-osmolar contrast agent.
机译:对比诱导的急性肾损伤是心脏导管插入术后突出的并发症,尽管近期风险逐步降低,具有适当的风险分层和使用更安全的造影剂。 尽管数据支持进一步降低与异摩尔代理剂的风险,但由于该试剂的前期成本增加,摄取可能滞后。 我们对使用低渗透造影剂进行了经济分析,估计利用碘司醇的策略的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号