...
首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse
【24h】

Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse

机译:与腹腔或腹腔镜骶骨的腹腔复制和治疗顶端脱垂的原生组织修复相比,对经腹膜或腹腔镜骶骨的复杂性和失效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our objective was to quantitate the extent of complications and failure rate for apical prolapse repair with transvaginal mesh (TVM) use versus sacrocolpopexy over a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.
机译:我们的目的是定量与经阴道网格(TVM)使用的软件脱垂修复的并发症和失败率的程度,而不是牺牲恐怖预防措施至少2年的随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号