首页> 外文期刊>Investigational new drugs. >A call for improved transparency in financial aspects of clinical trials: a case study of the CREATE-X trial in the New England Journal of Medicine
【24h】

A call for improved transparency in financial aspects of clinical trials: a case study of the CREATE-X trial in the New England Journal of Medicine

机译:呼吁改善临床试验财务方面的透明度:以新英格兰医学杂志的Create-X试验为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction Globally, laws and guidelines for managing conflict of interest are increasingly implemented to achieve transparency in financial ties between physicians and pharmaceutical and medical device industries, yet little information is available regarding the limitations of the current frameworks for disclosing these financial ties. Case In June 2017, the Capecitabine for Residual Cancer as Adjuvant Therapy (CREATE-X) trial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. In this study, which suggested the post-surgery addition of capecitabine would improve survival of high-risk breast cancer patients, the cost of capecitabine for off-label use was illegally claimed to the Japanese public health insurance system, rather than being covered by the research budget. This illegal claim led to the profit of more than 100,000,000 JPY (approximately 0.91 million USD) for Chugai Pharmaceutical Company (CPC), which manufactures capecitabine. Additional evidence suggests that the CPC made donations of at least 100,000,000 JPY (approximately 0.91 million USD) and 236,000.000 JPY (approximately 2.1 million USD) to the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group (JBCRG), the study's sponsor and fonder where the majority of the Japanese authors served high-level positions, and the Advanced Clinical Research Organization, the other study funder, respectively, during the study period, though the total amount has not been clarified. Neither the CPC's involvement nor its undue profit was mentioned in the published article. Conclusion This case report highlights the lack of financial transparency in the CREATE-X trial, and discusses the potential limitations that may exist in the current frameworks for disclosing financial ties between physicians and relevant industries in clinical trials. Achieving improved transparency is essential to heighten credibility in the findings of clinical trials.
机译:全球范围内,管理利益冲突的法律和准则越来越多地实施,以实现医生和制药和医疗设备行业的财务关系透明度,但有关目前框架披露这些财务关系的局限性的信息很少。案例于2017年6月,作为佐剂治疗(Create-X)审判的残留癌症的Capecitabine在新英格兰医学杂志上公布。在这项研究中,该研究表明,杂志三滨的手术后加入将提高高风险乳腺癌患者的存活,杂志的杂志的成本是非法声称日本公共卫生保险制度的,而不是被覆盖研究预算。这一非法索赔导致郑多曼制药公司(CPC)为100,000,000日元(约量0.91亿美元)的利润,该公司制造了Capecitabine。额外的证据表明,中共捐赠了至少10万日元(约0.91亿美元)和236,000.000日元(约有210万美元)的日本乳腺癌研究小组(JBCRG),该研究的赞助商和大多数日本人作者提供高级职位,以及在研究期间分别提供高级临床研究组织,其他研究呼吸员,但总金额尚未澄清。已发表的文章中提到了CPC的参与和过度利润。结论本案例报告突出了Create-X试验中缺乏财务透明度,并讨论了当前框架中可能存在的潜在限制,以披露医生与临床试验中有关行业的财务关系。实现改善的透明度对于提高临床试验结果中的可信度至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号