首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy - Indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases
【24h】

Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy - Indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases

机译:内侧开放的楔形与横向闭合楔形高胫骨截骨术 - 适应髌骨高度,腿长,扭转校正和临床结果的调查结果在一百个案例中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

IntroductionMedial open wedge (MOW) and lateral closed wedge (LCW) osteotomies are established methods to treat medial gonarthritis. Advantages and differences in the outcome of the two techniques have been discussed controversially and there is still no precise recommendation for either technique. We now aimed to assess the effect of each technique on tibial slope (TS), patella height (PH) and leg length discrepancy.MethodIn a study of 50 consecutive cases of MOW and 50 of LCW osteotomies were registered. The decision for either technique was made pre-operatively according to an algorithm. Demographic data, operation procedures (time of operation, correction angle, torsional correction) and measurement of patellar height, tibial slope, leg length discrepancy, clinical outcome after one year and bone and wound healing were obtained. Pre- and post-operative values were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn absence of randomization demographic data demonstrate comparability of the two groups. No difference in bone and wound healing, time of operation and clinical outcome was seen. In the MOW group PH decreased significantly, no relevant alteration of PH was detected in the LCW group. In the latter group a statistically significant decrease of TS compared to a slightly decrease in the MOW group was recorded post-operatively. A significant leg lengthening with the MOW and shortening of the leg with the LCW method can be achieved.DiscussionWith respect to similar results in operating procedures, bone and wound healing and clinical outcome decision making factors for either technique should be leg length discrepancy and torsional deformities. Changes of PH and TS have to be known and may influence the technique of osteotomy in cases of patella infera / alta or borderline PH.ConclusionAn algorithm for valgus high tibial osteotomies based on TS, PH and leg length discrepancy may be proposed.
机译:简介导通楔(割草)和横向闭合楔(LCW)截骨术是建立治疗内侧通道炎的方法。已经讨论了两种技术的结果的优点和差异,并且仍然没有精确推荐任何一种技术。我们现在旨在评估每种技术对胫骨斜率(TS),髌骨高度(pH)和腿长差异的影响。近期注册了割草率50例和50例的研究。根据算法预先操作地进行任一技术的判定。人口统计数据,操作程序(操作时间,校正角,扭转校正)和髌骨高度,胫骨坡,腿长差异,临床结果得到一年,骨骼和伤口愈合。在两组之间比较和操作后的值。缺乏随机性人口统计数据的缺乏,证明了两组的可比性。骨骼和伤口愈合没有差异,操作时间和临床结果。在MOW组pH中显着下降,在LCW组中没有检测到相关的pH的相关改变。在后一组与割草组略微减少的统计上显着降低,可操作地记录。可以实现与割草和缩短腿部与LCW方法的重要腿部延长。探讨了与操作程序,骨骼和伤口愈合的相似结果以及任一项技术的临床结果决策应该是腿部长度差异和扭转畸形。 。 pH和TS的变化必须已知,并且可能影响髌骨骤降或ALTA或边缘pH的情况下的截骨术技术。可以提出基于TS,pH和腿长差异的Valgus高胫骨骨膜术算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号