...
首页> 外文期刊>International ophthalmology >Comparison of surgical parameters using different lens fragmentation patterns in eyes undergoing laser-assisted cataract surgery
【24h】

Comparison of surgical parameters using different lens fragmentation patterns in eyes undergoing laser-assisted cataract surgery

机译:在经历激光辅助白内障手术中使用不同透镜碎片模式的手术参数的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose To compare surgical parameters among eyes undergoing laser-assisted cataract surgery (LACS) using different lens fragmentation patterns (LFP). Methods Prospective, randomized, unmasked clinical trial. One-hundred eyes underwent LACS and were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 LFP treatment groups: (1) laser capsulotomy only; no lens fragmentation (NLF) (n = 34); (2) three-plane chop (TPC) (n = 33); and, (3) pie-cut pattern (PCP) fragmentation (n = 33). Prechop phacoemulsification (PHACO) was performed on all eyes using the same femtosecond (FS) laser and active-fluidics PHACO machine. Main outcome measures: FS laser dock time (s), PHACO time (s), PHACO power (%), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) (%-s), irrigating fluid volume, and operative time. Results The 3 treatment groups were comparable in terms of patient age (P = 0.164) and nuclear density (P = 0.669). FS dock time was higher in the PCP group (184.18 ± 25.86) compared to the TPC (145.09 ± 14.15) group (P < 0.001). PHACO time was significantly shorter in the PCP (23.19 ± 17.20 s) compared to TPC (35.27 ± 17.70) and NLF (46.15 ± 23.72) groups (P < 0.001). PHACO power was lower in the PCP (11.81 ± 3.71) compared to the NLF (14.41 ± 1.88) and TPC (14.04 ± 2.46) groups (P < 0.001). CDE was lower in the PCP (2.85 ± 2.32) compared to NLF (6.55 ± 3.32) and TPC (6.55 ± 5.45) groups (P < 0.001). Fluid volumes and operative times were similar. Conclusion LFP can influence PHACO surgical parameters. Extensive fragmentation patterns such as PCP appear to lower PHACO time, power, and CDE and may potentially reduce the risk of PHACO related complications.
机译:用不同透镜碎片图案(LFP)在经历激光辅助白内障手术(LAC)的眼睛中的手术参数进行比较。方法前瞻性,随机,未掩蔽的临床试验。一百只眼睛接受了LAC,随机分配给3个LFP处理组中的1个:(1)仅限激光涂层术;没有透镜碎片(NLF)(n = 34); (2)三翼片(TPC)(N = 33);并且(3)饼切割模式(PCP)碎片(n = 33)。使用相同的飞秒(FS)激光器和活性流体验光机在所有眼睛上进行预析沉淀(Phaco)。主要观察措施:FS激光码头时间(S),Phaco时间(S),Phaco Power(%),累积耗散能量(CDE)(%-S),灌溉液体体积和操作时间。结果3种治疗组在患者年龄(P = 0.164)和核密度方面是可比的(P = 0.669)。与TPC(145.09±14.15)组(P <0.001)相比,PCP组(184.18±25.86)中的FS底座时间较高(184.18±25.86)。与TPC(35.27±17.70)和NLF(46.15±23.72)组(P <0.001)相比,PCP(23.19±17.20 s)中的PCP时间明显较短(23.19±17.20 s)。与NLF(14.41±1.88)和TPC(14.04±2.46)组(P <0.001)相比,PCP(11.81±3.71)中PCP(11.81±3.71)较低。与NLF(6.55±3.32)和TPC(6.55±5.45)组(P <0.001)相比,PCP(2.85±2.32)中的CDE较低(2.85±2.32)。流体体积和操作时间是相似的。结论LFP可以影响Phaco手术参数。诸如PCP的广泛的碎片模式似乎降低了Phaco时间,功率和CDE,并且可能会降低Phaco相关并发症的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号