首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Translenticular hydrodissection, lens fragmentation, and influence on ultrasound power in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange
【24h】

Translenticular hydrodissection, lens fragmentation, and influence on ultrasound power in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange

机译:飞秒激光辅助性白内障手术和屈光性晶状体置换术中的经皮镜下水切割,晶状体破裂以及对超声功率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To compare ultrasound time (UST) during femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange and evaluate UST during femtosecond laser surgery with and without a new technique, translenticular hydrodissection. Setting Centre for Sight, East Grinstead, West Sussex, United Kingdom. Design Comparative case series. Method This single-surgeon study compared consecutive femtosecond laser-assisted surgery (with and without translenticular hydrodissection to assist lens mobilization) and consecutive conventional surgery performed immediately before adoption of femtosecond laser technology. The mean US power, UST, and effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) in the 2 groups were compared. Further analysis of the femtosecond group compared translenticular hydrodissection and no translenticular hydrodissection. Results The mean US power, UST, and EPT were significantly longer in the conventional group (n = 108) than in the femtosecond group (n = 108) as follows: 7.30% ± 2.56% (SD) versus 5.32% ± 2.48% (P=.000); 9.89 ± 5.32 seconds versus 8.58 ± 4.66 seconds (P=.044); 0.87 ± 0.85 seconds versus 0.57 ± 0.51 seconds (P=.002), respectively. In the femtosecond group, parameters were significantly higher in eyes without translenticular hydrodissection (n = 27) than in eyes with translenticular hydrodissection (n = 81) as follows: 5.78% ± 2.23% versus 5.16% ± 2.56% (P=.046); 10.95 ± 4.66 seconds versus 7.78 ± 4.41 seconds (P=.046); 0.72 ± 0.26 seconds versus 0.52 ± 0.53 seconds (P=.002), respectively. Conclusion Femtosecond laser capsulotomy and lens fragmentation statistically significantly reduced UST over conventional surgery. Translenticular hydrodissection further reduced UST. Financial Disclosure Dr. Daya is a consultant to Bausch & Lomb and Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的比较飞秒激光辅助手术和常规白内障手术或屈光镜更换过程中的超声时间(UST),并评估飞秒激光手术中采用和不采用经穿刺性双眼水切割的新技术。英国西萨塞克斯郡东格林斯特德,视线设置中心。设计比较案例系列。方法这项单手术研究比较了连续飞秒激光辅助手术(有或没有经穿刺镜下的水切术以辅助晶状体动员)和采用飞秒激光技术之前连续进行的常规手术。比较两组的平均US功率,UST和有效超声乳化时间(EPT)。飞秒组的进一步分析比较了经皮穿刺性水镜解剖和无经穿刺性水镜解剖。结果常规组(n = 108)的美国平均功率,UST和EPT显着长于飞秒组(n = 108),如下所示:7.30%±2.56%(SD)对5.32%±2.48%(SD) P = .000); 9.89±5.32秒和8.58±4.66秒(P = .044);分别为0.87±0.85秒和0.57±0.51秒(P = .002)。在飞秒组中,参数如下:无穿刺性水镜清扫术的眼参数(n = 27)显着高于穿刺性水镜清扫术的眼参数(n = 81),如下所示:5.78%±2.23%vs 5.16%±2.56%(P = .046) ; 10.95±4.66秒和7.78±4.41秒(P = .046);分别为0.72±0.26秒和0.52±0.53秒(P = .002)。结论与常规手术相比,飞秒激光囊切开术和晶状体碎裂显着降低了UST。经皮镜下水切割进一步减少了UST。财务披露Daya博士是博士伦和Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH的顾问。没有任何作者在提及的任何材料或方法上具有财务或所有权利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号