首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Preference for oral sildenafil or intracavernosal injection in patients with erectile dysfunction already using intracavernosal injection for > 1 year.
【24h】

Preference for oral sildenafil or intracavernosal injection in patients with erectile dysfunction already using intracavernosal injection for > 1 year.

机译:对于已经使用大于1年的海绵体腔内注射的勃起功能障碍患者,首选口服西地那非或海绵体内注射。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Authors from Seoul describe their experience with patients already on triple therapy by intracavernosal injection who changed to oral sildenafil. Rather surprisingly, they found that patients had had a greater preference than expected for triple therapy, feeling that they had a better quality of erection on intracavernosal injection. The subject of the effect of renal transplantation on sperm quality and sex hormone levels is discussed by authors from Teheran. They found that sperm morphology and density remained unchanged, but there were significant improvements in sperm mobility. There was also an improvement in hormone levels and sexual function. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and preference for oral sildenafil or intracavernosal injection (ICI) therapy in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) already using ICI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 69 patients with ED (mean age 55.1 years, sd 12.3) on ICI therapy with triple solution (papaverine/phentolamine/prostaglandin-E1) for > 1 year were recruited for the study. Their erection quality, adverse reactions and selection rate of oral sildenafil or ICI as treatment, after using sildenafil for 3 months, and the reasons for their preferences, were compared between the regimens, RESULTS: Overall, 52 men (75%) responded to sildenafil; of these men, the erection quality with ICI was better than that with sildenafil in 46 (89%) and 16 (31%) preferred ICI as their treatment. Eighteen patients (35%) used each treatment alternately and 18 (35%) used sildenafil exclusively. The main reason given by patients for choosing ICI was a better quality of erection (74%). CONCLUSION: More patients with ED and using ICI preferred it as their main treatment than was expected, even though they had a good response to oral sildenafil. A better quality of erection with ICI was the reason why experienced patients chose this method, differing from the choice of patients starting treatment for ED.
机译:来自首尔的作者描述了他们对已经接受了海绵体腔内注射三重疗法的患者的经验,这些患者已改为口服西地那非。出乎意料的是,他们发现患者对三联疗法的偏好比预期的要大,感觉他们在海绵体腔内注射时的勃起质量更高。 Teheran的作者讨论了肾移植对精子质量和性激素水平的影响。他们发现精子的形态和密度保持不变,但是精子的活动性有了显着改善。激素水平和性功能也有所改善。目的:探讨已接受ICI治疗的勃起功能障碍(ED)患者口服西地那非或海绵体腔内注射(ICI)治疗的疗效和偏好。患者与方法:总共招募了69例接受ICI三联疗法(罂粟碱/苯妥拉明/前列腺素-E1)治疗ED的ED患者(平均年龄55.1岁,sd 12.3),研究时间超过1年。比较了西地那非治疗3个月后他们的勃起质量,不良反应和口服西地那非或ICI治疗的选择率,以及他们偏爱的原因,结果:总体上,共有52名男性(75%)对西地那非有反应;在这些男性中,ICI的勃起质量优于西地那非,其中46例(89%)和16例(31%)首选ICI作为他们的治疗方法。 18名患者(35%)交替使用每种治疗,而18名(35%)仅使用西地那非。患者选择ICI的主要原因是勃起质量更高(74%)。结论:尽管对口服西地那非有良好的反应,但有更多的ED并使用ICI的ED患者首选它作为主要治疗方法。与经验丰富的患者选择这种方法的原因不同,ICI的勃起质量更高,这与开始接受ED治疗的患者的选择不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号