...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Nurse-led immunotreatment DEcision Coaching In people with Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) - Feasibility testing, pilot randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation
【24h】

Nurse-led immunotreatment DEcision Coaching In people with Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) - Feasibility testing, pilot randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation

机译:护士LED免疫重新处理决策在多发性硬化症(减速器) - 可行性测试,试点随机对照试验和混合方法过程评估中的辅导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Treatment decision-making is complex for people with multiple sclerosis. Profound information on available options is virtually not possible in regular neurologist encounters. The "nurse decision coach model" was developed to redistribute health professionals' tasks in supporting immunotreatment decision-making following the principles of informed shared decision-making.& para;& para;Objectives: To test the feasibility of a decision coaching programme and recruitment strategies to inform the main trial.& para;& para;Design: Feasibility testing and parallel pilot randomised controlled trial, accompanied by a mixed methods process evaluation.& para;& para;Setting: Two German multiple sclerosis university centres.& para;& para;Participants pilot trial: People with suspected or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis facing immunotreatment decisions on first line drugs were recruited. Randomisation to the intervention (n = 38) or control group (n = 35) was performed on a daily basis. Quantitative and qualitative process data were collected from people with multiple sclerosis, nurses and physicians.& para;& para;Methods: We report on the development and piloting of the decision coaching programme. It comprises a training course for multiple sclerosis nurses and the coaching intervention. The intervention consists of up to three structured nurse-led decision coaching sessions, access to an evidence-based online information platform (DECIMS-Wiki) and a final physician consultation. After feasibility testing, a pilot randomised controlled trial was performed. People with multiple sclerosis were randomised to the intervention or control group. The latter had also access to the DECIMS-Wiki, but received otherwise care as usual. Nurses were not blinded to group assignment, while people with multiple sclerosis and physicians were. The primary outcome was 'informed choice' after six months including the sub-dimensions' risk knowledge (after 14 days), attitude concerning immunotreatment (after physician consultation), and treatment uptake (after six months). Quantitative process evaluation data were collected via questionnaires. Qualitative interviews were performed with all nurses and a convenience sample of nine people with multiple sclerosis.& para;& para;Results: 116 people with multiple sclerosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 73 (63%) were included. Groups were comparable at baseline. Data of 51 people with multiple sclerosis (70%) were available for the primary endpoint. In the intervention group 15 of 31 (48%) people with multiple sclerosis achieved an informed choice after six months and 6 of 20 (30%) in the control group. Process evaluation data illustrated a positive response towards the coaching programme as well as good acceptance.& para;& para;Conclusions: The pilot-phase showed promising results concerning acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, which was well perceived by people with multiple sclerosis, most nurses and physicians. Delegating parts of the immunotreatment decision-making process to trained nurses has the potential to increase informed choice and participation as well as effectiveness of patient-physician consultations.
机译:背景:治疗决策对于具有多发性硬化的人来说是复杂的。在常规神经科学专家们遭遇中几乎不可能有关可用选项的深刻信息。 “护士决策教练模式”是制定的,以重新分配卫生专业人员的任务,以便在知情共享决策原则后支持免疫协议决策。&段;&段;目标:测试决策教练计划和招聘的可行性通知主要审判的策略。¶¶设计:可行性测试和平行试验随机对照试验,伴随着混合方法的过程评估。¶¶设置:两个德国多发性硬化症大学中心。¶ &Para;参与者试验试验:招募有疑似或复发的人们在第一行药物上染色的多发性硬化的人。对干预(n = 38)或对照组(n = 35)的随机化是每天进行的。从多发性硬化症,护士和医生的人中收集量化和定性过程数据。&段;&段;方法:我们报告了决策教练的发展和试验。它包括用于多发性硬化护士和教练干预的培训课程。干预由最多三种结构化护士LED决策教练组成,获取基于证据的在线信息平台(Decims-Wiki)和最终的医生咨询。在可行性测试之后,进行试点随机对照试验。具有多发性硬化症的人被随机分配到干预或对照组。后者还可以访问Decims-Wiki,但会像往常一样关心。护士对团体分配没有蒙羞,而多发性硬化症和医生的人则是。六个月后,主要结果是“知情选择”,包括子维度的风险知识(14天后),有关免疫协商的态度(医生咨询后)和治疗摄取(六个月后)。通过问卷收集定量过程评估数据。与所有护士进行定性访谈,以及九个人有多种硬化症的便利样本。&段;结果:116人有多种硬化的人满足纳入标准,包括73(63%)。群体在基线上可比较。初级终点可获得51名具有多发性硬化症(70%)的人。在31例(48%)的干预组中,多发性硬化症的人们在对照组六个月和6个月后获得了明智的选择。过程评估数据说明了对教练计划的积极响应以及良好的接受。&段;&段;结论:试点相表明了有关干预的可接受性和可行性的有希望的结果,这是由多发性硬化的人感到充分感知,大多数护士和医生。委派教护士的免疫处理决策过程的各部分有可能提高知情选择和参与以及患者医师咨询的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号