...
首页> 外文期刊>Acute pain: international journal of acute pain management >How patients and physicians rate patients' pain in a French emergency department using a verbally administered numerical rating scale and a visual analog scale
【24h】

How patients and physicians rate patients' pain in a French emergency department using a verbally administered numerical rating scale and a visual analog scale

机译:患者和医生如何通过口头管理的数字评分量表和视觉模拟量表来评估法国急诊科的患者痛苦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The visual analog scale (VAS) and the verbally administered numerical rating scale (VNRS) are widely used to assess patients' pain in a French emergency department (ED).Study objectives: The aim of this study was to know how patients and physicians use these two scales in a French emergency department (ED).Methods: Patients (N=198) and their physicians (N = 48) rated the patients' pain from 0 to 10 using both VAS and VNRS, both at arrival at and on discharge from the ED.Results: The ratings obtained by VAS and VNRS were highly correlated, for both patients and physicians. The Bland-Altman analysis indicated for the patients 95% of the differences between VNRS and VAS ratings were between -2.18 and 1.43 and for the physicians 95% of the differences between the two scales were between -0.80 and 0.67.Conclusion: Systematic differences between the scores on VRS and VAS were small. In addition, VNRS is easier and quicker to administer and more patients are able to use it.
机译:背景:视觉模拟量表(VAS)和口头管理的数字评分量表(VNRS)在法国急诊科(ED)中广泛用于评估患者的疼痛。研究目的:本研究的目的是了解患者如何以及医生在法国急诊科(ED)中使用这两个量表。方法:患者(N = 198)和他们的医生(N = 48)在到达和到达时均使用VAS和VNRS对患者的疼痛程度进行了从0到10的评估。结果:通过VAS和VNRS获得的等级与患者和医师高度相关。 Bland-Altman分析显示,患者的VNRS和VAS评分之间的差异的95%在-2.18和1.43之间,对于医生而言,两个量表之间的95%的差异在-0.80和0.67之间。 VRS和VAS的分数很小。此外,VNRS的管理更加简便快捷,并且更多的患者能够使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号