首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO VIEWS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE UNDER ARTICLE 5 (4) OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL, CONCERNING COMMUNICATION NOS. 2747/2016 & 2807/2016 (H.R. COMM.)
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO VIEWS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE UNDER ARTICLE 5 (4) OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL, CONCERNING COMMUNICATION NOS. 2747/2016 & 2807/2016 (H.R. COMM.)

机译:委员会根据“任择议定书”第5(4)条通过的介绍介绍,关于沟通号码。 2747/2016和2807/2016(H.R.Com)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On July 17, 2018, the Human Rights Committee, the monitoring body of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), rendered decisions in two similar cases brought by two French nationals against the French state. Both petitioners were Muslim women who challenged Act No. 2010-1192 of 11 October 2010, a French law under which wearing of the niqab, also known as a "full-face veil," in public spaces is prohibited. These seminal cases constitute the first time that an international arbiter of human rights has ruled that France's face-veil ban violates the human rights of its citizens.
机译:2018年7月17日,人权委员会是公民权利和政治权利国际公约的监督机构(ICCPR),在两个法国国民对法国国家带来的两个类似案件中的决定。 征求人士都是2010年10月11日第2010年10月11日挑战的穆斯林妇女,该法法禁止在公共场所佩戴NIQAB的法国法律,亦称“全面面纱”。 这些开创性案件第一次成为人权的第一次裁定法国面纱禁止违反其公民的人权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号