【24h】

Incompleteness in the Bell Theorem Using Non-contextual Local Realistic Model

机译:使用非上下文局部现实模型的贝尔定理中的不完整性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Here, we consider the Bell experiment for a system described by multipartite states in the case where n-dichotomic observables are measured per site. If n is two, we consider a two-setting Bell experiment. If n is three, we consider a three-setting Bell experiment. Two-setting model is an explicit local realistic model for the values of a correlation function, given in a two-setting Bell experiment. Three-setting model is an explicit local realistic model for the values of a correlation function, given in a three-setting Bell experiment. In the non-contextual scenario, there is not the difference between three-setting model and two-setting model. And we cannot classify local realistic theories in this case. This says that we can construct three-setting model from two-setting model. Surprisingly we can discuss incompleteness in the Bell theorem using non-contextual model. On the other hand, in the contextual scenario, there is the difference between three-setting model and two-setting model. This says that we must distinguish three-setting model from two-setting model. And we can classify local realistic theories in this case.
机译:在这里,我们考虑在每位网站测量N-二分观察可观察到的情况下由多分钟状态描述的系统进行的钟实验。如果n是两个,我们考虑一个两个设置的钟实验。如果n是三个,我们考虑三个设置的钟实验。两个设置模型是一个明确的局部现实实际模型,用于相关函数的值,给出了两个设置响铃实验。三个设定模型是一个明确的局部现实实际模型,用于相关函数的值,给出了三个设置响铃实验。在非上文方案中,三个设置模型和两个设置模型之间没有区别。在这种情况下,我们无法归类当地的现实理论。这表明我们可以从两个设置模型构建三个设置模型。令人惊讶的是,我们可以使用非上文模型讨论贝尔定理中的不完整性。另一方面,在上下文方案中,三个设置模型和两个设置模型之间存在差异。这表明我们必须将三种设置模型与两个设置模型区分开来。我们可以在这种情况下分类当地的现实理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号