首页> 外文期刊>International journal of rheumatic diseases >Superiority of laterally elevated wedged insoles to neutrally wedged insoles in medial knee osteoarthritis symptom relief
【24h】

Superiority of laterally elevated wedged insoles to neutrally wedged insoles in medial knee osteoarthritis symptom relief

机译:横向升高的楔形鞋底的优越性在内侧膝关节骨关节炎中中性楔形鞋垫症状浮雕

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: Knee osteoarthritis (OA), is the most common degenerative joint disease. Several non-pharmacological interventions have been used for this purpose such as insoles. There are contradictory data about the superiority and effectiveness of laterally wedged compared with neutrally wedged insoles. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of laterally and neutrally wedged insoles in management of knee OA. Methods: In this double-blind, parallel treatment trial, 118 patients with knee OA according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were enrolled and were followed for 2 months. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Fifty-seven of them were treated with 5° laterally elevated wedged insoles (group A) and 61 patients were treated with neutrally wedged insoles (group B). Edinburg Knee Functional Scale (EKFS) was used to evaluate knee function before and after interventions. At the end of 2 months, severity of knee pain during the previous 2 days, numbers of non-steroid anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used for pain relief within the last 2 weeks and EKFS were assessed. Results: Severity of knee pain decreased in both groups after intervention. The mean difference in groups A (laterally wedged insole) and B (neutrally wedged insole) were 29.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 25.12, 33.55) and 6.25 (95% CI: 3.09, 9.4), respectively (P < 0.001 for both). In addition, at the end of the study, EKFS improved significantly in group A (mean: 7.54, 95% CI: 6.3, 8.8; P < 0.001), while in group B we could not find significant improvement (mean: 0.54, 95% CI: -0.41, 1.5; P = 0.166). Numbers of NSAIDs used during the two final weeks of the study significantly decreased compared with baseline in group A (P = 0.001; mean: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.3, 3.9); while in group B this was not shown (P = 0.9; mean: 0.05, 95% CI:-0.87, 0.97). Conclusion: This study suggests that laterally elevated wedged insoles are more effective than neutrally wedged insoles, in pain relief of knee OA.
机译:目的:膝关节骨关节炎(OA),是最常见的退行性关节疾病。几种非药理学干预措施已用于此目的,例如鞋垫。与中性楔形鞋垫相比,存在关于横向楔形的优越性和有效性的矛盾数据。本研究旨在比较膝关节OA管理中横向和中立楔形鞋垫的有效性。方法:在这种双盲,并联治疗试验中,根据美国风湿病学院(ACR)标准的118名膝关节OA患者注册,并进行了2个月。患者随机分为两组。用5°横向升高的楔形鞋垫(A组)和61名患者用中性楔形鞋垫(B组)进行处理。 Edinburg膝关节功能规模(EKFS)用于评估干预措施前后的膝关节功能。在2个月底之前,在过去2天期间,膝关节疼痛的严重程度,评估了在过去2周和EKF中用于疼痛缓解的非类固醇抗炎药(NSAID)。结果:干预后两组膝关节疼痛的严重程度降低。 (横向楔形鞋底)和B(中性楔形鞋底)的平均差异分别为29.3(95%置信区间[95%CI]:25.12,33.55)和6.25(95%CI:3.09,9.4)(P <0.001两个)。此外,在研究结束时,AKF在A组中显着改善(平均值:7.54,95%CI:6.3,8.8; P <0.001),而在B组中我们找不到显着的改进(平均值:0.54,95 %CI:-0.41,1.5; p = 0.166)。在研究中,在研究的两个最后几周使用的NSAID数量显着降低了A组中的基线(P = 0.001;平均值:2.6,95%CI:1.3,3.9);虽然在B组中,但没有显示出来(p = 0.9;平均值:0.05,95%CI:-0.87,0.97)。结论:本研究表明,在膝关节OA的疼痛缓解中,横向升高的楔形鞋垫比中性楔形鞋垫更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号