...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping >Determination of area reduction rate by spherical indentation test
【24h】

Determination of area reduction rate by spherical indentation test

机译:球形压痕试验测定面积减少率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rate of area reduction is an important mechanical property to appraise the plasticity of metals, which is always obtained from the uniaxial tensile test. A methodology is proposed to determine the area reduction rate by continuous ball indentation test technique. The continuum damage accumulation theory has been adopted in this work to identify the failure point in the indentation. According to this theory, the damage is accumulated in the material during the test with voids nucleating and growing, which can be divided into two stages due to the variation in the degree of constraint. The turning point between two stages can be identified as the failure point where the material beneath the indenter collapses. The corresponding indentation depth of this point can be obtained and used to estimate the area reduction rate. The local strain limit criterion proposed in the ASME VIII-2 2007 alternative rules is also adopted in this research to convert the multiaxial strain of indentation test to uniaxial strain of tensile test. This method can be useful in engineering practice to evaluate the material degradation under severe working condition due to the non-destructive nature of ball indentation test. In order to validate the method, spherical indentation test is performed on ferritic steel 16MnR and B16, then the results are compared with that got from the traditional uniaxial tensile test. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:区域减少率是评估金属可塑性的重要机械性质,总是从单轴拉伸试验中获得。提出了一种方法来确定连续球缩进测试技术的面积减少率。在这项工作中采用连续损伤积累理论,以确定压痕中的失败点。根据该理论,在试验期间,用空隙成核和生长的试验期间损伤累积,这可以分为由于约束程度的变化而被分成两个阶段。两个阶段之间的转折点可以被识别为压痕下折叠下方的材料的故障点。可以获得该点的相应凹痕深度,并用于估计面积减小率。本研究还采用了ASME VIII-2 2007年替代规则中提出的局部应变极限标准,以转化对拉伸试验的单轴菌株的压痕试验的多轴菌株。该方法可用于工程学实践,以评估严重的工作条件下的物质劣化由于球凹口试验的非破坏性。为了验证该方法,在铁素体钢16MNR和B16上进行球形压痕试验,然后将结果与传统的单轴拉伸试验相比。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号