...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of paediatric dentistry >Use of distraction techniques for the management of anxiety and fear in paediatric dental practice: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Use of distraction techniques for the management of anxiety and fear in paediatric dental practice: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

机译:在儿科牙科实践中使用分心技术来管理焦虑和恐惧:对随机对照试验的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Objective To determine whether distraction techniques (DT) reduce children's/adolescent's anxiety and fear during dental treatment. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which any type of DT were used to manage dental anxiety and dental fear in children/adolescents were included. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and Google Scholar was conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, assessed methodological quality of studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool (CCRBT), and approached certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Data were analysed descriptively. Results Twenty studies covering several types of DT (audio, audiovisual, instruments camouflage, biofeedback, dental operating microscope, toys) were included. Qualitative analysis showed with very low certainty of evidence that DT effectively reduced dental anxiety and fear depending on the distraction type, instrument used to measure dental anxiety and dental fear, and dental procedure. CCRBT evaluation identified many methodological issues in included studies. Conclusion There is a very low certainty of evidence that DT can be effective in managing children's/adolescents’ dental fear and anxiety during dental treatment. The heterogeneity of methodologies and findings in the studies, however, suggests more robust, and well‐executed RCTs are needed.
机译:摘要目的判断令人沮丧的技术(DT)是否减少牙科治疗期间儿童/青少年的焦虑和恐惧。方法包括随机对照试验(RCT),其中任何类型的DT用于管理儿童/青少年中的牙科焦虑和牙科恐惧。对PubMed,Scopus,Cochrane图书馆,丁香和Google学者进行了系统搜索。两个独立审稿人选择研究,提取数据,使用Cochrane协作的偏置工具(CCRBT)的风险评估了研究的方法,以及使用成绩的证据确定(建议,评估,开发和评估等级的证据确定。描述了解数据。结果包括二十项研究,涵盖了几种类型的DT(音频,视听,仪器伪装,生物融产,牙科操作显微镜,玩具)。定性分析表现出很低的证据,即DT根据分心类型,用于测量牙科焦虑和牙齿恐惧的仪器和牙科手术,有效地降低了牙科焦虑和恐惧。 CCRBT评估确定了包括研究中的许多方法问题。结论DT可以有效地确定了在牙科治疗期间管理儿童/青少年的牙科恐惧和焦虑。然而,研究中的方法和发现的异质性表明需要更强大,并且需要良好的RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号