...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of modern physics, D. Gravitation, astrophysics, cosmology >Why scalar–tensor equivalent theories are not physically equivalent?
【24h】

Why scalar–tensor equivalent theories are not physically equivalent?

机译:为什么标量张浪潮等效理论不是物理上等同的?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Whether Jordan’s and Einstein’s frame descriptions of F(R) theory of gravity are physically equivalent, is a long standing debate. However, practically none questioned on true mathematical equivalence, since classical field equations may be translated from one frame to the other following a transformation relation. Here, we show that, neither Noether symmetries, Noether equations, nor may quantum equations be translated from one to the other. The reason being, — conformal transformation results in a completely different system, with a different Lagrangian. Field equations match only due to the presence of diffeomorphic invariance. Unless a symmetry generator is found which involves Hamiltonian constraint equation, mathematical equivalence between the two frames appears to be vulnerable. In any case, in quantum domain, mathematical and therefore physical equivalence cannot be established.
机译:无论是乔丹和爱因斯坦的重心理论的帧质描述是否物理上等同,是一个长期的辩论。 然而,实际上没有质疑真正的数学等价,因为经典场方程可以在变换关系之后从一个帧转换到另一帧。 在这里,我们表明,既不是挪威尔纽测量器,挪威物程度,也不能从一个到另一个。 存在的原因, - 适形转化导致完全不同的系统,不同的拉格朗日。 现场方程仅匹配,因为存在漫反应不变性。 除非找到涉及哈密顿约束方程的对称发生器,否则两帧之间的数学等效似乎是易受攻击的。 在任何情况下,在量子域中,数学且因此无法建立物理等价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号