...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of older people nursing >Staff personhood in dementia care settings: “Do they care about me?”
【24h】

Staff personhood in dementia care settings: “Do they care about me?”

机译:痴呆症护理环境中的工作人员:“他们关心我吗?”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aims and objectives This article aims to examine RCA s’ own experiences of personhood in dementia care settings. Background Conceptually, person‐centred care entails fostering the personhood of residents and the residential care aides ( RCA s) who provide much of their hands‐on care. To date, however, staff personhood has been overlooked in the empirical literature. Design The study was part of a larger focused ethnographic project exploring how the organisational care environment impedes or facilitates the provision of quality dementia care. Methods Semi‐structured interviews with 23 RCA s and more than 230?hours of participant observation were conducted in two nursing homes with specialised dementia units in British Columbia, Canada. Results Two overarching themes, “personhood undermined—management‐staff relations” and “personhood undermined—workplace policies and practices” emerged, illustrating how, despite exposure to features believed beneficial to their working environment (e.g., favourable staffing ratios, relatively good remuneration), RCA s encountered repeated affronts to their personhood. The first theme encompasses the importance of being known (i.e., as persons and of their job demands) and valued (i.e., appreciated for their work in non‐monetary terms). The second highlights the salience of work‐life balance, full‐staffing coverage and supportive human resource practices. Conclusions RCA s’ experiences reveal how the ongoing search for cost‐efficiencies, cost‐containment and cost‐accountability overshadows their individuality, indicating a key disconnect between conceptual ideals and workplace realities. Implications for practice Organisations are encouraged to consider creating person‐centred management and workplace practices that provide tangible evidence that RCA s, and their work, matter.
机译:目的和目标本文旨在审查RCA S'在痴呆症护理环境中的人格经验。背景技术概念上,以人为本的护理需要培养居民的人格和居住的助手(RCA S),他们提供了大部分实践护理。然而,迄今为止,员工人物被忽视了实证文学。设计该研究是探索组织护理环境如何阻碍或促进提供质量痴呆护理的一部分更大的聚焦民族志。方法采访23 rca s及超过230多小时的参与者观察,在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的专业痴呆症单位进行了两小时的参与者观察。结果两项总体主题,“人格破坏 - 管理人员关系”和“人的削弱 - 工作场所政策和实践”,尽管曝光对其工作环境有利于有利于其工作环境的特征(例如,有利的人员,薪酬相对良好) ,RCA S遇到了对他们的个性的重复侮辱。第一个主题包括所知的重要性(即,作为他们的工作要求)和有价值(即,以非货币性术语的工作表示赞赏)。第二次突出了工作生活平衡,全面覆盖范围和支持人力资源实践的显着性。结论RCA S'的经验揭示了持续寻求成本效率,成本遏制和成本责任的经历,掩盖了他们的个性,表明概念理想和工作场所现实之间的关键断开。鼓励对实践组织的影响考虑创建以人为本的管理和工作场所实践,提供RCA S及其工作的有形证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号