首页> 外文期刊>International journal of legal medicine >Intra-class and inter-class tool discrimination through micro-CT analysis of false starts on bone
【24h】

Intra-class and inter-class tool discrimination through micro-CT analysis of false starts on bone

机译:通过微型CT分析对骨骼进行微型CT分析的阶级和级别的工具歧视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Micro-CT has successfully been applied to the characterization of false starts (FSs) and, among several parameters, kerf width seems to correlate to the tool blade. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of micro-CT for the differentiation of saw marks produced by different classes of saws and by saws belonging to the same class and differing only in number of teeth per inches (TPI). A morphological and morphometric analysis of 84 marks, produced by 6 saws belonging to 3 morphological classes, was performed. In the experimental cohort, for each parameter, statistically significant differences in intra- and inter-class analysis were searched for and cut-offs were established. The diagnostic accuracy of cut-offs was assessed through statistical analyses on the validation cohort. The morphological assessment did not allow to differentiate saws differing only in TPI. Angle 1 and top kerf width, respectively for cross-cut and rip-cut saws with alternating set, allowed a good discrimination between FSs produced by tools belonging to the same morphological class. High positive predictive values were found in intra-class analyses, while results in inter-class analyses were less encouraging. In cases of dismemberment, a micro-CT-based analysis of FSs is strongly suggested as a part of a multistep and multimodal methodology of assessment, which includes scanning electron microscopy and stereomicroscopy. A morphological assessment should be followed by an experimental trial and by a morphometric analysis. Further studies are needed to evaluate hampering factors, such as damage by physico-chemical agents.
机译:Micro-CT已成功应用于假启动(FSS)的表征,并且在几个参数中,Kerf宽度似乎与刀具刀片相关。本研究的目的是评估Micro-CT对不同类别锯和属于同一类的锯片产生的锯数和不同的锯数的诊断价值,仅在每英寸(TPI)的齿数中不同。进行了84个标记的形态学和形态学分析,由属于3个形态学类的6个锯产生。在实验队列中,对于每个参数,搜查了统计上显着的分析内和阶级分析的差异,并建立了截止。通过验证队列的统计分析评估截止截止的诊断准确性。形态学评估不允许在TPI中区分锯不同。角度1和顶部Kerf宽度分别用于交替设定的交叉切割和撕裂锯,允许在属于相同形态学的工具生产的FSS之间进行良好的判别。在课外分析中发现了高阳性预测值,同时阶级间分析的结果较小。在肢解的情况下,强烈建议FSS的微型CT分析作为多数和评估的多模式方法的一部分,其包括扫描电子显微镜和立体镜检查。形态学评估应遵循实验试验,并通过形态学分析。需要进一步的研究来评估妨碍因素,例如受到物理化学药物的损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号