...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of language & communication disorders >A systematic review and classification of interventions for speech‐sound disorder in preschool children
【24h】

A systematic review and classification of interventions for speech‐sound disorder in preschool children

机译:学龄前儿童语音障碍的干预措施的系统审查与分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Multiple interventions have been developed to address speech sound disorder (SSD) in children. Many of these have been evaluated but the evidence for these has not been considered within a model which categorizes types of intervention. The opportunity to carry out a systematic review of interventions for SSD arose as part of a larger scale study of interventions for primary speech and language impairment in preschool children. Aims To review systematically the evidence for interventions for SSD in preschool children and to categorize them within a classification of interventions for SSD. Methods & Procedures Relevant search terms were used to identify intervention studies published up to 2012, with the following inclusion criteria: participants were aged between 2 years and 5 years, 11 months; they exhibited speech, language and communication needs; and a primary outcome measure of speech was used. Studies that met inclusion criteria were quality appraised using the single case experimental design (SCED) or PEDro‐P, depending on their methodology. Those judged to be high quality were classified according to the primary focus of intervention. Outcomes & Results The final review included 26 studies. Case series was the most common research design. Categorization to the classification system for interventions showed that cognitive–linguistic and production approaches to intervention were the most frequently reported. The highest graded evidence was for three studies within the auditory–perceptual and integrated categories. Conclusions & Implications The evidence for intervention for preschool children with SSD is focused on seven out of 11 subcategories of interventions. Although all the studies included in the review were good quality as defined by quality appraisal checklists, they mostly represented lower‐graded evidence. Higher‐graded studies are needed to understand clearly the strength of evidence for different interventions.
机译:抽象背景已经开发了多种干预措施来解决儿童的语音声音障碍(SSD)。其中许多已经评估,但这些证据尚未在分类干预类型的模型中被考虑。作为对学龄前儿童初级言语和语言损害的初步研究的一部分,有机会对SSD的干预措施进行系统审查。旨在系统地审查学龄前儿童的SSD干预措施的证据,并在SSD的干预措施分类中对其进行分类。方法&程序相关搜索术语用于识别发布的干预研究,该研究最高可达2012年,但下列纳入标准:参与者年龄在2年和5年之间,11个月;他们表现出言语,语言和沟通需求;使用讲话的主要结果衡量标准。符合纳入标准的研究是使用单个案例实验设计(SCED)或PEDRO-P的质量评估,具体取决于其方法。根据干预的主要焦点,判断为高质量的人被分类。结果&结果最终审查包括26项研究。案例系列是最常见的研究设计。对干预措施的分类系统分类表明,最常报告的介入的认知语言和生产方法是最常见的。评分最高的证据是在听觉 - 感知和综合类别中的三个研究。结论&致力于有关SSD的学龄前儿童干预的证据专注于11个次疗程的七个杂项。虽然审查中包含的所有研究都是质量优良的质量,但质量评估清单定义,它们主要代表较低的证据。需要更高评级的研究来清楚地了解不同干预措施的证据强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号