首页> 外文期刊>International journal of human-computer studies >What's in it for me? Self-serving versus other-oriented framing in messages advocating use of prosocial peer-to-peer services
【24h】

What's in it for me? Self-serving versus other-oriented framing in messages advocating use of prosocial peer-to-peer services

机译:我有什么东西? 在倡导使用Prosocial对等服务的消息中,自助与其他面向的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present a study that investigates the effectiveness of self-serving versus other-oriented motivational framing of messages designed to persuade people to sign up for a prosocial peer-to-peer (P2P) service. As part of the study, volunteer message senders were incentivized to recruit people to sign up for one of three types of prosocial P2P services. Senders were given an option of choosing one of four pre-designed invitation messages to send to their contacts, two framed for self-serving motivations and two framed for other-oriented motivations. We found that recipients were more attracted to click on messages emphasizing self-serving benefits. This may not match the expectation of senders, who generally prioritized other-oriented motives for participating in prosocial P2P services. However, after recipients clicked the messages to investigate further, effects of self versus other-framing messages depended on the nature of the service. Our findings suggest that, even for prosocial services, messages offering self-serving motivations are more effective than altruistic ones on inspiring interests. But the overall persuasive effect on conversion may be more nuanced, where the persuasion context (service type) appears to be a critical moderator. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们提出了一项研究,调查自址的有效性与旨在说服人们对ProSocial对等(P2P)服务注册的邮件的其他导向框架的有效性。作为研究的一部分,志愿者留言发件人被激励招募人员以报名参加三种类型的ProSocial P2P服务之一。发件人选择选择四个预先设计的邀请信息中的一个,以发送到他们的联系人,两个框架用于自助式动机,两个框架用于其他面向的动机。我们发现收件人更有吸引,以单击强调自助福利的消息。这可能与发件人的期望不匹配,他们通常优先考虑参与Prosocial P2P服务的其他导向的动机。但是,在收件人点击消息后,进一步调查,自我与其他帧消息的影响取决于服务的性质。我们的调查结果表明,即使对于女性化服务,提供自助动力的信息比吸引人的利益更有效。但是对转换的总体说服力效果可能更为细微,其中说服上下文(服务类型)似乎是一个关键的主持人。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号