...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hyperthermia: The official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group >Locoregional hyperthermia of deep-seated tumours applied with capacitive and radiative systems: a simulation study
【24h】

Locoregional hyperthermia of deep-seated tumours applied with capacitive and radiative systems: a simulation study

机译:应用电容性和辐射系统的深层肿瘤的型型热疗:模拟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Locoregional hyperthermia is applied to deep-seated tumours in the pelvic region. Two very different heating techniques are often applied: capacitive and radiative heating. In this paper, numerical simulations are applied to compare the performance of both techniques in heating of deep-seated tumours.Methods: Phantom simulations were performed for small (30x20x50cm(3)) and large (45x30x50cm(3)), homogeneous fatless and inhomogeneous fat-muscle, tissue-equivalent phantoms with a central or eccentric target region. Radiative heating was simulated with the 70MHz AMC-4 system and capacitive heating was simulated at 13.56MHz. Simulations were performed for small fatless, small (i.e. fat layer typically 2cm) and large (i.e. fat layer typically 3cm) patients with cervix, prostate, bladder and rectum cancer. Temperature distributions were simulated using constant hyperthermic-level perfusion values with tissue constraints of 44 degrees C and compared for both heating techniques.Results: For the small homogeneous phantom, similar target heating was predicted with radiative and capacitive heating. For the large homogeneous phantom, most effective target heating was predicted with capacitive heating. For inhomogeneous phantoms, hot spots in the fat layer limit adequate capacitive heating, and simulated target temperatures with radiative heating were 2-4 degrees C higher. Patient simulations predicted therapeutic target temperatures with capacitive heating for fatless patients, but radiative heating was more robust for all tumour sites and patient sizes, yielding target temperatures 1-3 degrees C higher than those predicted for capacitive heating.Conclusion: Generally, radiative locoregional heating yields more favourable simulated temperature distributions for deep-seated pelvic tumours, compared with capacitive heating. Therapeutic temperatures are predicted for capacitive heating in patients with (almost) no fat.
机译:背景:盆腔区域的型型热疗应用于骨盆区的深层肿瘤。通常应用两个非常不同的加热技术:电容和辐射加热。在本文中,应用数值模拟来比较两种加热深层瘤肿瘤中两种技术的性能。方法:对小(30x20x50cm(3))和大(45x30x50cm(3))进行幻影模拟,均匀脂肪和不均匀的脂肪肌肉,组织当量的含有中央或偏心靶区域的幽灵。用70MHzAMC-4系统模拟辐射加热,并在13.56MHz上模拟电容加热。对小脂肪,小(即,通常是脂肪层通常为2cm)和大(即脂肪层通常& 3cm)患者进行仿真。使用恒定的高温级灌注值模拟温度分布,其组织限制为44摄氏度,并比较两种加热技术。结果:对于小均匀的幽灵,预测相似的目标加热,具有辐射和电容加热。对于大型均匀的幻影,具有电容性加热预测最有效的目标加热。对于不均匀的幽灵,脂肪层中的热点限制足够的电容加热,并且具有辐射加热的模拟目标温度越高。患者仿真预测治疗目标温度随着无脂患者的电容性加热,但对所有肿瘤部位和患者尺寸辐射加热更加稳健,屈服于目标温度高于预测电容加热的目标温度。结论:一般来说,辐射局部加热与电容加热相比,为深座位骨盆肿瘤产生更有利的模拟温度分布。预测治疗温度对于(几乎)没有脂肪的患者的电容加热。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号