首页> 外文期刊>International journal of health services: planning, administration, evaluation >Is There Less Labor Market Exclusion of People With Ill Health in 'Flexicurity' Countries? Comparative Evidence From Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, and Belgium
【24h】

Is There Less Labor Market Exclusion of People With Ill Health in 'Flexicurity' Countries? Comparative Evidence From Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, and Belgium

机译:在“柔韧性”国家的健康状况不佳的人中有较少的劳动力市场? 来自丹麦,挪威,荷兰和比利时的比较证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Higher employment rates among vulnerable groups is an important policy goal; it is therefore vital to examine which social policies, or mix of policies, are best able to incorporate vulnerable groups - such as people with ill health - into the labor market. We examine whether 2 "flexicurity" countries, Denmark and the Netherlands, have less labor market exclusion among people with ill health compared to the neighboring countries of Norway and Belgium. We analyze the 2 country pairs of Denmark-Norway and the Netherlands-Belgium using OLS regressions and propensity score kernel matching of EU-SILC panel data (2010-2013). Both unemployment and disability likelihood is remarkably similar for people with ill health across the 4 countries, despite considerable social policy differences. There are 3 possible explanations for the observed cross-national similarity. First, different social policy combinations could lead toward the same employment outcomes for people with ill health. Second, most policy instruments are located on the supply side, and demand side reasons for the observed "employment penalty" (e.g., employer skepticism/discrimination) are often neglected. Third, it is too demanding to hold (full-time) employment for a sizeable proportion of those who have poor health status.
机译:弱势群体中的更高的就业率是一个重要的政策目标;因此,审查哪些社会政策或政策混合,最好能够将弱势群体纳入弱势群体 - 例如有健康的人 - 进入劳动力市场。我们仔细检查了2个“柔韧性”国家,丹麦和荷兰,与挪威和比利时的邻国相比,健康状况不佳的劳动力市场排斥。我们使用OLS回归和Eu-Silc面板数据(2010-2013)分析了丹麦 - 挪威和荷兰 - 比利时的2个国家对 - 比利时(2010-2013)。尽管有相当大的社会政策差异,但在整个4个国家的健康状况良好的人的可能性非常相似。观察到的跨国相似性有3个可能的解释。首先,不同的社会政策组合可能导致与健康状况不佳的人相同的就业结果。其次,大多数政策工具都位于供应方面,并且往往忽略了观察到的“就业刑罚”(例如,雇主怀疑/歧视)的提高原因。第三,它过于急需持有(全职)就业以获得较差的健康状况的大量比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号