...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Epidemiology: Official Journal of the International Epidemiological Association >Answer to the commentary: Politics and public health--some conceptual considerations concerning welfare state characteristics and public health outcomes.
【24h】

Answer to the commentary: Politics and public health--some conceptual considerations concerning welfare state characteristics and public health outcomes.

机译:回答评论:政治和公共卫生 - 关于福利国家特征和公共卫生成果的一些概念考虑因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We appreciate the detailed analysis of our paper by Olle Lundberg, including his criticisms, even though many are unfair and unwarranted. Lundberg takes us to task for emphasizing politics rather than policies in our quest to understand health outcomes. He also erroneously assumes that we ignore the context in which politics occurs. He writes that Sweden and Austria, for example, have been governed by social democratic parties for long periods of time and yet have different welfare states, and he presents this as proof of how wrong it can be to take politics and years in government of a political party as a predictor of the type of welfare state or health outcomes. Moreover, he adds that welfare state regimes behave differently with respect to social transfers vs public services, and that this makes it difficult to determine the impact of politics on welfare states and health outcomes. Finally, Lundberg concludes that politics is of even less value when we try to understand health inequalities.
机译:我们感谢Olle Lundberg对我们文件的详细分析,包括他的批评,即使许多人不公平和无人物。 Lundberg将我们联系到强调政治而不是在寻求理解健康结果的政策中的任务。他还错误地假设我们忽略了政治发生的上下文。例如,他撰写了瑞典和奥地利,长期受到社会民主党派的管辖,但却有不同的福利国家,他认为这是如何在一个政治政治中采取政治和年份的错误证明政党作为福利国家或健康成果类型的预测因素。此外,他补充说,福利国家制度在社会转移与公共服务方面的行为不同,这使得这很难确定政治对福利国家和健康结果的影响。最后,当我们试图了解健康不平等时,伦德伯格的结论是,当我们试图了解健康不平等时,政治甚至更有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号