...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization >Comparison of Separation Performance of Liquid-Solid Fluidized Bed Separator and Dense Medium Cyclone for Cleaning Coal
【24h】

Comparison of Separation Performance of Liquid-Solid Fluidized Bed Separator and Dense Medium Cyclone for Cleaning Coal

机译:液固流化床分离器分离性能和密集介质旋风的比较清洗煤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Both a liquid-solid fluidized bed separator (LSFBS) and a dense med- ium cyclone (DMC) are used for cleaning coal of -1+0.25 mm size. However, a comparison of LSFBS and DMC's performance in separa- tion of difficult-to-separate coal has seldom been reported. Difficult- to-separate coarse coal from the Tangkou plant was processed using LSFBS and DMC. The products with the same ash content were analyzed by the float-sink tests to compare the separation effkien- cies. According to the results, the concentrate yield and Ep value obtained by the DMC were 48.85% and 0.045, respectively, while the values obtained by LSFBS were 32.86% and 0.12, respectively. The results showed that DMC was more efficient than LSFBS for separating the Tangkou difficult-to-separate coal with a higher yield and a lower Ep value.
机译:液体固体流化床分离器(LSFB)和致密的Med-Ium Cyclone(DMC)都用于清洁煤的1 + 0.25mm的尺寸。 然而,LSFBS和DMC在难以分离的煤炭中的性能的比较很少被报道。 使用LSFBS和DMC处理来自唐嘴植物的难以分开的粗煤。 通过浮动水槽测试分析具有相同灰分含量的产品,以比较分离效果。 根据结果,DMC获得的浓缩产率和EP值分别为48.85%和0.045,而LSFBS的值分别为32.86%和0.12。 结果表明,DMC比LSFB更有效,用于将汤庄难以分开的煤与更高的产量和较低的EP值分离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号