...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical practice >Concordance with antibiotic guidelines in Australian primary care: A retrospective study of prior‐to‐hospital therapy
【24h】

Concordance with antibiotic guidelines in Australian primary care: A retrospective study of prior‐to‐hospital therapy

机译:澳大利亚初级保健中的抗生素准则的一致性:回顾性研究前医院治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary Background Appropriate antibiotic prescribing improves patient outcomes and mitigates antimicrobial resistance. As the majority of antibiotics are used in the community, rational prescribing in this setting is of paramount importance. Objectives We aimed to (1) evaluate the concordance of community antibiotic prescribing with guidelines for three common infection types among patients who presented to hospital, and (2) identify relationships between guideline concordance and patient‐related factors. Methods Medical records were evaluated from the Royal Hobart Hospital (Tasmania, Australia) for patients presenting with respiratory tract, urinary tract or skin and soft tissue infections within a 12‐month period. Prior‐to‐hospital antibiotic therapy was assessed for concordance with prescribing guidelines based on presenting diagnosis. Concordance was assessed against first‐line recommendations in the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines ‐ Antibiotic, based on drug choice, dose, frequency and patient factors. Descriptive statistics were performed to address Objective 1. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to address Objective 2 with the following independent variables: infection type, age, allergies, diabetes status, gender and residential setting. Results A total of 285 patient records were eligible for data analysis; 28.8% (n?=?82) were fully guideline concordant. The most common reason for non‐concordance was inappropriate drug choice (n?=?143, 50.2%). Patients with the following characteristics were less likely to receive concordant therapy: diabetes (OR?=?0.3, 95% CI 0.1‐0.8, P ?=?.02) and increasing age (OR?=?0.99, 95% CI 0.98‐1.00, P ?=?.04). Conclusions Almost three‐quarters of patients received community‐initiated antibiotic therapy that was not fully guideline concordant. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are urgently needed to improve guideline concordance for community‐initiated antibiotic therapy.
机译:发明内容背景适当的抗生素规定改善了患者结果并减轻抗微生物抗性。随着大多数抗生素在社区中使用,这种环境中的理性处方是至关重要的。我们针对(1)的目标评估群落抗生素方案的一致性与提交医院的患者的三种常见感染类型的指南,(2)确定指南一致性与患者相关因素之间的关系。方法评估医疗记录,用于在12个月内患有呼吸道,尿路或皮肤和软组织感染的患者的皇家霍巴特医院(澳大利亚)评估。在基于呈现诊断的情况下,评估了医院前抗生素治疗的一致性。根据药物选择,剂量,频率和患者因素,根据澳大利亚治疗指南的一线建议进行了一致性评估了一致性。描述性统计数据进行了解决目标1.通过以下独立变量进行多变量逻辑回归来解决目标2:感染类型,年龄,过敏,糖尿病身份,性别和住宅环境。结果共有285名患者记录有资格进行数据分析; 28.8%(n?=?82)是完全指导协调。非协调性最常见的原因是不适当的药物选择(n?= 143,50.2%)。具有以下特征的患者不太可能接受一致性疗法:糖尿病(或?=Δ0.3,95%CI 0.1-0.8,P?= 02)和增加的年龄(或?= 0.99,95%CI 0.98- 1.00,p?=?04)。结论几乎四分之三的患者接受了群落引发的抗生素治疗,这些抗生素治疗不是完全指导的协调。迫切需要抗微生物管道干预措施,以改善社区发起的抗生素治疗的指南一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号