首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biometeorology: Journal of the International Society of Biometeorology >Effects of shade location and protection from direct solar radiation on the behavior of Holstein cows
【24h】

Effects of shade location and protection from direct solar radiation on the behavior of Holstein cows

机译:遮阳地理辐射对荷斯坦奶牛行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two trials (E1 and E2) were performed to assess the behavior of eight Holstein dairy cows with 367 +/- 58 kg of body weight and 10.52 +/- 0.08 kg of milk yield. A 4 x 4 Latin square design (four periods of lactation and four levels of solar blockage) with four paddocks was used. Each paddock contained a wood shading structure covered with a cloth that blocked 30% (T1), 50% (T2), 70% (T3), or 100% (T4) of direct solar radiation. In the first trial (E1) each shade structure was located approximately 40 m from the feeder and water troughs; in the second trial (E2), the distance was reduced to 5 m. Air temperature (T-A, degrees C), relative humidity (R-H, %), wind speed (U, ms(-1)), black globe temperature (T-G, K), mean radiant temperature (T-MR, K), radiant heat load (R-HL, W m(-2)), and local shortwave radiation (R-S, W m(-2)) were recorded at 15-min intervals from 08:00 to 17:00 h. Four behavioral activities were recorded: grazing, eating at the feed trough, ruminating, and idling. For each of these activities, animal posture (lying or upright) and location (under shade or exposed to sunlight) were recorded. The meteorological conditions showed similar variations from 8:00 to 17:00 h between the two trials. However, the air temperatures in E1 were lower (+/- 2 degrees C) than those in E2. In a PCA analysis, the first and the second principal components explained 56.87% and 21.85%, respectively, of the total variation in the behavioral variables. Under the E1 conditions, the animals did not seek shade, whereas in E2, the dairy cows spent 35 +/- 5% of their time lying and idling in the shade. At a solar radiation blockage of 100%, cows were in the shade more than 60% of the time due to the intensity of solar radiation, which was 722.19 +/- 14.59 W m(-2) at 11:45. In a PCA analysis, the first and the second principal components explained 65.18 and 22.3%, respectively, and 87.48% together, of the total variation in the original variables. Consequently, it was possible to develop a shade index (IST) based on the first two components. In E1, animals spent very little time in the shade, spending only 0.15% of total time under the shade, irrespective of blockage. However, E2 cows used shade, reaching almost 80% of time under the shade, at midday, when the blockage was 100%.
机译:进行两项试验(E1和E2)以评估八孔奶牛的行为,体重367 +/- 58千克,10.52 +/- 0.08千克牛奶产量。使用4 x 4拉丁方形设计(四个哺乳期和四个水平的太阳能阻塞),使用四个围场。每个围场都含有覆盖的木制遮蔽结构,覆盖着堵塞30%(T1),50%(T2),70%(T3)或100%(T4)的直接太阳辐射。在第一次试验(E1)中,每个遮阳结构距离馈线和水槽约40米;在第二次试验(E2)中,距离降至5米。空气温度(Ta,℃),相对湿度(RH,%),风速(U,MS(-1)),黑球温度(Tg,K),平均辐射温度(T-MR,K),辐射热载荷(R-HL,W M(-2))和局部短波辐射(Rs,W M(-2))以08:00至17:00以15分钟记录。记录了四项行为活动:放牧,在饲料槽中吃,反刍和空转。对于这些活动中的每一个,记录动物姿势(躺着或直立)和位置(在阴影下或暴露在阳光下)。气象条件在两项试验之间从8:00到17:00 h显示出类似的变化。然而,E1中的空气温度低于E2中的+/- 2℃)。在PCA分析中,第一和第二主成分分别解释了行为变量总变化的56.87%和21.85%。在E1条件下,动物没有寻找阴影,而在E2中,奶牛花了35 +/- 5%的时间撒谎和怠速。在太阳辐射堵塞100%的情况下,奶牛在阴凉处超过60%的时间由于太阳辐射强度,11:45为722.19 +/-14.59 W m(-2)。在PCA分析中,第一个和第二主成分分别在原始变量的总变化中分别解释了65.18和22.3%,87.48%。因此,可以基于前两个组件开发阴影指数(IST)。在E1中,动物在阴影中花费了很少的时间,无论堵塞都有0.15%的总时间的0.15%。然而,E2奶牛使用阴影,在额外的堵塞下达到近80%的时间,堵塞100%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号