首页> 外文期刊>International immunopharmacology >The effects of modified versus unmodified wheat gluten administration in patients with celiac disease
【24h】

The effects of modified versus unmodified wheat gluten administration in patients with celiac disease

机译:改性与未经修饰小麦麸质给药在乳糜泻患者中的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Celiac disease (CD) treatment requires a gluten-free diet (GFD), although alternative approaches have been proposed. Modification of gliadin peptides using microbial transglutaminase (mTG) inhibits their ability to induce immune response in vitro. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of mTG-modified wheat flour ingestion in CD patients. Twenty-one CD patients in remission were randomized to receive mTG-modified (n = 11) or unmodified (n = 10) wheat flour rusks, in double-blind fashion. Monthly, patients completed a symptom questionnaire. Serum anti-tTG, EMA and creatinine levels were monitored. At baseline and after 90 days, serum anti-actin antibodies (AAA) were measured and upper endoscopy was performed. Data were analyzed by non-parametric tests. 7/11 patients eating modified rusks and 7/10 patients receiving unmodified rusks completed the study. At baseline, all patients showed negative serum anti-tTG and EMA results. At the end, 2/7 (28.6%) patients ingesting modified and 4/7 (57.1%) patients taking unmodified rusks presented positive serum anti-tTG and EMA results. Creatinine results were unmodified. Moreover, 1/7 (143%) patients ingesting modified and 4/7 (57.1%) patients taking unmodified rusks presented villous atrophy. In patients who received unmodified rusks, the AAA levels increased significantly and duodenal anti-tTG levels appeared higher than those measured in patients who ate modified rusks. Abdominal swelling, bloating and nausea were more severe in patients ingesting unmodified rusks than those taking modified rusks. Our results may support larger clinical trials to confirm the enzymatic treatment of wheat flour as an alternative to GFD. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:乳糜泻(CD)治疗需要无麸质饮食(GFD),尽管已经提出了替代方法。使用微生物转谷氨酰胺酶(MTG)的胶质苷肽的改性抑制它们在体外诱导免疫反应的能力。我们的目的是评估CD患者MTG改性小麦粉的安全性。缓解中的二十一张CD患者被随机分配以接收MTG改性(n = 11)或以双盲方式接收未修饰的(n = 10)小麦粉射出。每月,患者完成了症状问卷。监测血清抗TTG,EMA和肌酐水平。在基线和90天后,测量血清抗肌动蛋白抗体(AAA)并进行上内窥镜检查。通过非参数测试分析数据。 7/11患者吃修饰的戒露和7/10患者接受未修改的射击完成了该研究。在基线时,所有患者均显示阴性血清抗TTG和EMA结果。最后,2/7(28.6%)摄入的患者,采用未修改的戒露的患者进行改性和4/7(57.1%)呈现阳性血清抗TTG和EMA结果。肌酐结果未改性。此外,1/7(143%)患者摄入修饰,4/7(57.1%)患者采用未修改的射击呈现绒毛萎缩。在接受未经修改的射击的患者中,AAA水平显着增加,并且十二指肠抗TTG水平似乎高于患者测量的患者,患有修饰的射击。腹部肿胀,膨胀和恶心在摄入未经修改的射出的患者比考虑修饰的射出的患者更严重。我们的结果可能支持较大的临床试验,以确认小麦粉的酶促治疗作为GFD的替代品。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号