...
首页> 外文期刊>International endodontic journal >Does ultraconservative access affect the efficacy of root canal treatment and the fracture resistance of two‐rooted maxillary premolars?
【24h】

Does ultraconservative access affect the efficacy of root canal treatment and the fracture resistance of two‐rooted maxillary premolars?

机译:超级侵入性接入是否会影响根管治疗的疗效和双生根上颌前磨牙的骨折抗性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Aim To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative endodontic cavities ( UEC ) on canal shaping and filling ability, cleaning of the pulp chamber, time required to perform root canal treatment and fracture resistance of 2‐rooted maxillary premolars in comparison with traditional endodontic access cavities ( TEC ) in extracted teeth placed in a phantom head to simulate clinical conditions. Methodology Twenty extracted intact 2‐rooted maxillary premolars were scanned in a micro‐computed tomographic device, matched based on similar anatomical features of the canals and assigned to UEC or TEC groups ( n ?=?10). Then, teeth were mounted on a mannequin head and their pulp chamber accessed. After canal preparation, filling and cavity restoration, the time required to perform root canal treatment was recorded and the specimens were loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine. The maximum load at fracture was recorded. The sample was scanned after root canal instrumentation, filling and restoration procedures. Untouched canal areas, accumulation of hard‐tissue debris ( AHTD ), voids in root fillings and cleaning of the pulp chamber were analysed. Data were analysed statistically using Shapiro–Wilk and Student's t‐tests with a significance level of 5%. Results The percentage of untouched canal area did not differ significantly between UEC and TEC groups ( P? ? 0.05). However, UEC s were associated with a greater percentage of AHTD after canal preparation ( P? ? 0.05). No differences were observed in terms of voids in root fillings between the groups ( P? ? 0.05). Nonetheless, UEC had a greater percentage of root filling remnants in the pulp chamber after cleaning procedures ( P? ? 0.05). The time required to perform root canal treatment was significantly longer in the UEC group ( P? ? 0.05). There was no difference regarding the mean load at fracture between the groups ( P? ? 0.05). Unrestorable fractures were observed in all specimens of both groups. Conclusions There was no true benefit associated with ultraconservative endodontic cavities. UEC resulted in more AHTD remaining inside the root canals. UEC did not influence the quality of root fillings; however, UEC made the cleaning procedure of the pulp chamber more difficult, thus increasing the total time required to perform root canal treatment. Moreover, UEC were not associated with an increase in fracture resistance of root filled 2‐rooted maxillary premolars.
机译:摘要旨在评估超级化胸腔腔(UEC)对管道成型和填充能力,清洁纸浆室的影响,与传统的牙髓接近腔( TEC)在置于幽灵头中的提取牙齿以模拟临床条件。方法中二十提取的完整的2根颌上颌上初级映射在微计算机断层件中扫描,基于运河的类似解剖特征匹配,并分配给UEC或TEC组(n?=?10)。然后,将牙齿安装在时装模特上,并进入它们的纸浆室。在管道制备,填充和腔恢复后,记录进行根管治疗所需的时间,并将样品加载到通用试验机中的断裂。记录破裂时的最大载荷。在根管仪器仪表,填充和恢复程序后扫描样品。分析了不触及的管区,硬组织碎片(AHTD)的积累,在根填充物中的空隙和纸浆室的清洁。使用Shapiro-Wilk和学生的T检验进行统计分析数据,其显着性水平为5%。结果UEC和TEC组之间未触压的管区的百分比没有显着差异(P?& 0.05)。然而,UEC S与运河制备后的更大百分比的AHTD(p≤≤0.05)相关。在组之间的根填充中的空隙方面没有观察到差异(p?& 0.05)。尽管如此,UEC在清洁程序后在纸浆室中具有更大的根填充残余物(p≤≤0.05)。在UEC组中,执行根管治疗所需的时间较长较长(P≤≤0.05)。对组之间的裂缝的平均载荷没有差异(P?& 0.05)。在两组的所有标本中观察到不熟练的骨折。结论没有真正的益处与超侵入性胸腔腔相关。 UEC导致剩下的剩余AHTD。 UEC没有影响根填充物的质量;然而,UEC使纸浆室的清洁过程更加困难,从而增加了执行根管治疗所需的总时间。此外,UEC与根部填充的2根上颌前磨牙的根部裂缝抗性的增加无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号