Does the volume of supplemental intraligamentary injections affect the anaesthetic success rate after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block? A randomized‐double blind clinical trial

摘要

Abstract Aim To investigate the efficacy of 0.2?mL vs. 0.6?mL of 2% lidocaine when given as a supplementary intraligamentary injection after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Methodology Ninety‐seven adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits received an IANB and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain during treatment was recorded using a visual analogue scale (Heft‐Parker VAS ). Patients with unsuccessful anaesthesia ( n? =?78) randomly received intraligamentary injection of either 0.2?mL or 0.6?mL of 2% lidocaine with 1?:?80?000 epinephrine. Root canal treatment was reinitiated. Success after primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain ( HP VAS score ≤54?mm) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anaesthetic success rates were analysed with Pearson chi‐square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate changes were analysed using t ‐tests. Results The intraligamentary injections with 0.2?mL solution gave an anaesthetic success rate of 64%, whilst the 0.6?mL was successful in 84% of cases with failed primary IANB . (χ 2 ?=?4.3, P? =?0.03). There was no significant effect of the volume of intraligamentary injection on the change in heart rate. Conclusions Increasing the volume of intraligamentary injection improved the success rates after a failed primary anaesthetic injection.