首页> 外文期刊>Intensive and critical care nursing >Validation of two Chinese-version pain observation tools in conscious and unconscious critically ill patients
【24h】

Validation of two Chinese-version pain observation tools in conscious and unconscious critically ill patients

机译:有意识和无意识的两种中文版疼痛观测工具的验证危重病患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objectives To compare the construct validities of the Chinese-versions Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioural Pain Scale as measures of critically ill patients’ pain by (a) discriminant validation of behavioural scales and vital signs (e.g. heart rate and mean arterial pressure) during a non-nociceptive procedure (noninvasive blood pressure] assessment) and a nociceptive procedure (endotracheal suctioning), (b) criterion validation of behavioural scales and vital signs with patients’ self-reported pain and (c) testing the interrater reliability of both scores. Research methodology/design In this crossover, observational study, pain responses of 316 critically ill patients (213 conscious; 103 unconscious) were measured by both the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and the Behavioural Pain Scale scores, vital signs and self-report (if conscious) during noninvasive blood pressure assessment and endotracheal suctioning procedures. Interrater reliability was tested in nociceptive procedures of a pilot study on 20 critically ill patients. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics, multiple logistic regression analysis and receiver-operating characteristic curves. Setting A medical intensive care unit in a regional teaching hospital in northern Taiwan. Results Patients’ self-reported pain was predicted by total Critical Care Pain Observation Toolscores (odds ratio=1.93, p 0.01) and total Behavioural Pain scores (odds ratio=1.83, p 0.01) but not by vital signs after controlling for patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Moreover, Chinese-versions had areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 76.4% and 73.1%, respectively, indicating good ability to detect pain. Conclusions The Chinese-versions of the Critical care Pain Observation Toll and Behavioural Pain Score have good construct validity and can sensitively discriminate when critically ill patients experience pain or no pain.
机译:摘要目标,比较汉语 - 版本的关键治疗疼痛观察工具和行为疼痛规模的构建有效性作为危重患者痛苦的措施(a)判别验证行为尺度和生命症状(例如心率和平均动脉压)在非伤害手术(非侵入性血压]评估)期间和伤害手术(内部吸血管),(b)对行为尺度的标准验证和与患者的自我报告的疼痛和(c)测试中断的可靠性两个分数。研究方法/设计在这种交叉,观察性研究中,316名危重病人的疼痛反应(213名意识; 103个无意识)通过关键护理疼痛观察工具和行为疼痛评分,生命迹象和自我报告来测量(如果有意识)在非血压血压评估和气管内吸附程序期间。 Interriter可靠性在20名批评患者的试验研究的伤害程序中进行了测试。通过描述性统计,多元逻辑回归分析和接收器操作特征曲线分析数据。在台湾北部地区教学医院设定医疗密集护理单位。结果患者的自我报告的疼痛预计通过总关键护理疼痛观察刀具(差距= 1.93,p 0.01)和总行为疼痛评分(差距= 1.83,p 0.01),但在控制患者人口后不受生命的迹象和临床特征。此外,中国 - 版本的接收器操作特征曲线分别具有76.4%和73.1%,表明良好的检测疼痛能力。结论中文 - 版本的关键护理疼痛观察疾病和行为疼痛评分具有良好的构建有效性,并且可以在危重病人体验疼痛或没有疼痛时敏感地歧视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号