...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing the incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing the incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:非药理学干预措施在减少患者患者中谵妄发病率和持续时间的有效性:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions versus standard care on incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients.MethodsWe searched electronic and grey literature for randomised clinical trials up to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected and extracted data. Meta-analysis was undertaken using random effects modelling.ResultsWe identified 15 trials (2812 participants). Eleven trials reported incidence of delirium. Pooled data from four trials of bright light therapy showed no significant effect between groups (n=829 participants, RR 0.45, 99% CI 0.10-2.13, P=0.19, very low quality evidence). Seven trials of various individual interventions also failed to report any significant effects. A total of eight trials reported duration of delirium. Pooled data from two trials of multicomponent physical therapy showed no significant effect [n=404 participants, MD (days) -0.65, 99% CI -2.73 to 1.44, P=0.42, low quality of evidence]. Four trials of various individual interventions also reported no significant effects. A trial of family voice reorientation showed a beneficial effect [n=30, MD (days) -1.30, 99% CI -2.41 to -0.19, P=0.003, very low quality evidence].ConclusionsCurrent evidence does not support the use of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients. Future research should consider well-designed and well-described multicomponent interventions and include adequately defined outcome measures.
机译:Purposeto评估非药理学干预与标准治疗谵妄患者患者的发病率和持续时间的效果.Thodswe在2018年3月的随机临床试验中搜索了电子和灰色文学。两个审稿人独立筛选,选择和提取数据。使用随机效应进行META分析MODELSE.Resultwe确定了15项试验(2812名参与者)。 11次试验报告谵妄发病率。来自亮光疗法的四次试验的汇总数据显示,组之间没有显着效果(n = 829名参与者,RR 0.45,99%CI 0.10-2.13,P = 0.19,质量证据非常低)。各种单独干预措施的七项试验也未能报告任何显着影响。共有八项试验报告谵妄持续时间。来自两种多组分物理治疗试验的汇总数据显示没有显着影响[n = 404参与者,MD(天)-0.65,99%CI -2.73至1.44,P = 0.42,证据质量低]。各种各种干预的四次试验也没有报告没有显着影响。家庭语音重新定位的试验显示有益效果[n = 30,md(天)-1.30,99%ci -2.41至-0.19,p = 0.003,非常低的质量证据] .ConclusionsCurrent证据不支持使用非 - 减少患者患者谵妄发病率和持续时间的疗法干预。未来的研究应考虑精心设计,更精心描述的多组分干预措施,包括充分定义的结果措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号