首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >From “Her” Problem to “Our” Problem: Using an Individual Lens Versus a Social-Structural Lens to Understand Gender Inequity in STEM
【24h】

From “Her” Problem to “Our” Problem: Using an Individual Lens Versus a Social-Structural Lens to Understand Gender Inequity in STEM

机译:从“她”问题“我们的”问题:使用个别镜头与社会结构镜头来理解干的性别不公平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Increasing the representation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is one of our nation's most pressing imperatives. As such, there has been increased lay and scholarly attention given to understanding the causes of women's underrepresentation in such fields. These explanations tend to fall into two main groupings: individual-level (i.e., her) explanations and social-structural (i.e., our) explanations. These two perspectives offer different lenses for illuminating the causes of gender inequity in STEM and point to different mechanisms by which to gain gender parity in STEM fields. In this article, we describe these two lenses and provide three examples of how each lens may differentially explain gender inequity in STEM. We argue that the social-structural lens provides a clearer picture of the causes of gender inequity in STEM, including how gaining gender equity in STEM may best be achieved. We then make a call to industrial/organizational psychologists to take a lead in addressing the societal-level causes of gender inequality in STEM.
机译:增加妇女在科学,技术,工程和数学(Stew)中的代表性是我们国家最紧迫的要求之一。因此,旨在了解妇女在这些领域的代表性代表性的原因,有所增加。这些解释倾向于分为两个主要分组:个人级别(即,她)解释和社会结构(即,我们)的解释。这两个观点提供了不同的镜片,用于照亮茎中性别不公平的原因,并指向不同机制,从而获得干田的性别平等。在本文中,我们描述了这两个镜头,并提供了三个例子的每个镜头可以差异地解释茎中的性别不公平。我们认为社会结构镜片提供了更清晰的阀杆性别不公平的原因的图片,包括如何最好地实现茎中的性别股权。然后,我们打电话给工业/组织心理学家,以履行茎中性别不平等的社会级原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号