...
首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >Methotrexate and Thioguanine Rescue Therapy for Conventional Thiopurine Failing Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Multi-center Database Study on Tolerability and Effectiveness.
【24h】

Methotrexate and Thioguanine Rescue Therapy for Conventional Thiopurine Failing Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Multi-center Database Study on Tolerability and Effectiveness.

机译:甲氨蝶呤和Thioguanine救援治疗用于常规硫喷妥嘌呤未发生溃疡性结肠炎患者:多中心数据库研究耐受性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) failing conventional therapies are in need of rescue strategies. Due to the fact that accepted step-up therapy with biologicals is expensive and sometimes unavailable, alternative therapies are warranted. Methotrexate (MTX) and thioguanine (TG) have both been suggested as alternative maintenance strategies in conventional thiopurine failing UC patients. In this multicenter database study, we compared safety and effectiveness (drug-survival) of MTX and TG in UC patients. We collected data from the Parelsnoer database, a prospective Dutch national database consisting of inflammatory bowel disease patients from all university hospitals in The Netherlands. Additional data were collected from detailed chart review. In total, 99 UC patients were included, of which 48 used TG, 43 used MTX, and 8 patients had a history of both TG and MTX use. In 12% of the patients, biological therapy had failed. Roughly 70% of the patients in both groups were able to continue therapy for over 1 year. Adverse events were noted in 33% of all the patients and were mainly elevated liver enzymes or gastrointestinal complaints. Twenty-eight patients (28%) continued therapy (15 TG, 13 MTX) without the need of escalation therapy (eg, corticosteroids, biologicals, or surgery). Drug survival curves of both drugs were comparable, just as the number of patients with sustained clinical benefit of therapy (P > 0.05). Both MTX and TG may be used and maintained as rescue therapy with sustained clinical benefit in one-third of the UC patients failing conventional therapies.
机译:有活性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的患者因常规疗法而有需要救援策略。由于具有生物学的升级治疗昂贵的升级疗法昂贵,有时不可用,因此有必要替代疗法。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和Thioguanine(TG)已被建议作为常规硫嘌呤未发生UC患者的替代维护策略。在这种多中心数据库研究中,我们在UC患者中比较了MTX和TG的安全性和有效性(药物存活)。我们从Parelsnoer数据库中收集了数据,该数据库是由荷兰所有大学医院的炎症性肠病患者组成的令人终端的荷兰国家数据库。从详细图表审查中收集了其他数据。总共包括99例UC患者,其中48例二手TG,43例使用的MTX,8名患者患有TG和MTX的历史。在12%的患者中,生物治疗失败了。大约70%的两组患者能够继续治疗超过1年。在所有患者的33%中注意到不良事件,主要是肝酶或胃肠道投诉的33%。二十八名患者(28%)继续治疗(15 TG,13 MTX),无需升级治疗(例如,皮质类固醇,生物学或手术)。两种药物的药物存活曲线都是可比的,正如持续临床疗效的患者的数量(p> 0.05)。 MTX和Tg均可用于抢救治疗,以急性临床效益在未发生常规疗法的UC患者中持续临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号