...
首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >No Significant Association Between the Fecal Microbiome and the Presence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome-type Symptoms in Patients with Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
【24h】

No Significant Association Between the Fecal Microbiome and the Presence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome-type Symptoms in Patients with Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

机译:粪便微生物组之间没有显着关联和静态炎症性肠疾病患者患者肠症状症状的存在。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The microbiome is implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Whether a distinct microbiome profile is associated with the reporting of IBS-type symptoms in IBD patients is uncertain. We aimed to resolve this issue using a cross-sectional study design. Using clinical disease activity indices, the Rome III criteria for IBS and fecal calprotectin levels, we divided IBD patients into 4 groups: IBS-type symptoms, quiescent disease, occult inflammation, and active disease. A16S rRNA microbiome analysis was performed to determine whether any taxa were differentially abundant, and whether there were any differences in alpha or beta diversity in patients reporting IBS-type symptoms compared with those in the other 3 groups. Of 270 patients included, 70 (25.9%) had IBS-type symptoms, 81 (30.0%) quiescent IBD, 66 (24.4%) occult inflammation, and 53 (19.6%) active IBD. At phylum level, there was a nonsignificant increase in the abundance of Actinobacteria in patients reporting IBS-type symptoms, but no other differences at any taxonomic level. When compared with patients reporting IBS-type symptoms, mean alpha diversity was greater in patients with quiescent disease, although this was nonsignificant (28.6 vs 31.7, P = 0.33), and similar to those with occult inflammation and active disease. Beta diversity variation among the 4 groups was significant for unweighted (P = 0.002) but not weighted (P = 0.21) UniFrac analysis. Reporting IBS-type symptoms was not associated with distinct microbiome alterations. Unmeasured confounding could have impacted the significance of our findings.
机译:微生物组涉及炎症性肠病(IBD)和肠易肠综合征(IBS)的发病机制。不同的微生物组简档是否与IBD患者IBS型症状的报告相关联的是不确定的。我们旨在使用横断面研究设计解决此问题。使用临床疾病活动指数,罗马III的IBS和粪便酸癌水平的标准,我们将IBD患者分为4组:IBS型症状,静态疾病,吞噬炎症和活跃疾病。 A16S RRNA微生物组分析进行了判断是否有含有差异丰富的差异,以及在与其他3组中的那些患者报告IBS型症状的患者中α或β多样性是否存在任何差异。包括270名患者,70例(25.9%)具有IBS型症状,81例(30.0%)静态IBD,66(24.4%)潜水炎症,53(19.6%)活性IBD。在门平均值,报告IBS型症状的患者患者的丰度增加,但任何分类水平都没有其他差异。与报告IBS型症状的患者相比,静态疾病患者的平均α多样性更大,尽管这是不显着的(28.6 vs 31.7,p = 0.33),并且与具有血迹炎症和活性疾病的患者类似。 4组中的β多样性变异对于未加权(P = 0.002)而异(P = 0.002),但未加权(P = 0.21)免疫克分析。报告IBS型症状与不同的微生物组改变无关。未测量的混乱可能会影响我们的研究结果的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号