首页> 外文期刊>Infection control and hospital epidemiology >Assessment of antibiotic-resistant organism transmission among rooms of hospitalized patients, healthcare personnel, and the hospital environment utilizing surrogate markers and selective bacterial cultures
【24h】

Assessment of antibiotic-resistant organism transmission among rooms of hospitalized patients, healthcare personnel, and the hospital environment utilizing surrogate markers and selective bacterial cultures

机译:评估住院患者,医疗保健人员和医院环境的住院患者,医院环境的抗生素抗性生物传播和选择性细菌培养

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To assess potential transmission of antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs) using surrogate markers and bacterial cultures. Design: Pilot study. Setting: A 1,260-bed tertiary-care academic medical center. Participants: The study included 25 patients (17 of whom were on contact precautions for AROs) and 77 healthcare personnel (HCP). Methods: Fluorescent powder (FP) and MS2 bacteriophage were applied in patient rooms. HCP visits to each room were observed for 2-4 hours; hand hygiene (HH) compliance was recorded. Surfaces inside and outside the room and HCP skin and clothing were assessed for fluorescence, and swabs were collected for MS2 detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and selective bacterial cultures. Results: Transfer of FP was observed for 20 rooms (80%) and 26 HCP (34%). Transfer of MS2 was detected for 10 rooms (40%) and 15 HCP (19%). Bacterial cultures were positive for 1 room and 8 HCP (10%). Interactions with patients on contact precautions resulted in fewer FP detections than interactions with patients not on precautions (P < .001); MS2 detections did not differ by patient isolation status. Fluorescent powder detections did not differ by HCP type, but MS2 was recovered more frequently from physicians than from nurses (P = .03). Overall, HH compliance was better among HCP caring for patients on contact precautions than among HCP caring for patients not on precautions (P = .003), among nurses than among other nonphysician HCP at room entry (P = .002), and among nurses than among physicians at room exit (P = .03). Moreover, HCP who performed HH prior to assessment had fewer fluorescence detections (P = .008). Conclusions: Contact precautions were associated with greater HCP HH compliance and reduced detection of FP and MS2.
机译:目的:使用替代标志物和细菌培养评估抗生素抗性生物(AROS)的潜在传播。设计:试点研究。环境:1,260床三级学术学院医疗中心。参与者:该研究包括25名患者(其中17名是AROS联系人的预防措施)和77名医疗保健人员(HCP)。方法:荧光粉(FP)和MS2噬菌体应用于患者室。 HCP访问每个房间2-4小时;手工卫生(HH)记录符合规定。对房间内外的表面和HCP皮肤和衣物进行荧光,并通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)和选择性细菌培养物收集SWAB。结果:观察到FP的转移20间房间(80%)和26个HCP(34%)。检测MS2的转移10间(40%)和15个HCP(19%)。细菌培养物为1室和8个HCP(10%)。与接触预防措施的患者的相互作用导致FP检测较少,而不是与未采用预防措施的患者的相互作用(P <.001); MS2检测没有患者隔离状态没有差异。荧光粉末检测没有通过HCP类型的差异,但是MS2从医生那里比来自护士更频繁地回收(P = .03)。总体而言,HH合规性在联系预防措施的患者中,对于未采用预防措施的患者(P = .003),在房间入口处(P = .002)和护士中,患者的HCP关怀比房间出口的医生(p = .03)。此外,在评估前进行HH的HCP具有较少的荧光检测(P = .008)。结论:接触注意事项与更高的HCP HH合规性和降低FP和MS2的检测相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号