...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian heart journal >“Ultra-rapid” sequential treatment in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: alternative same-day approach to laparoendoscopic rendezvous
【24h】

“Ultra-rapid” sequential treatment in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: alternative same-day approach to laparoendoscopic rendezvous

机译:胆囊化致氯化胆胆管胆囊中的“超快速”顺序治疗:促进曲线透视结合的替代相同日方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2015, Italian Society of Surgery (SIC). ? 2015, Italian Society of Surgery (SIC). There is still no consensus about timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. The aim of our retrospective study is to analyze the optimal timing of surgical treatment in patients presenting concurrent choledocholithiasis, choosing to perform a sequential endoscopic plus surgical approach, introducing a same-day two-stage alternative. All cases of cholecystocholedocholithiasis occurred between January 2007 and December 2014 in “Gradenigo” Hospital (Turin—Italy) were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups, based on the timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and compared. Out of 2233 cholecystectomies performed in the mentioned time interval, have been identified 93 patients that fulfill the selection criteria. 36 patients were treated with a same-day approach, while 29 within first 72?h and 28 with delayed surgery. The overall length of stay was significantly lower in patients that were treated with a same-day approach (4.7?days), compared with other groups (p?=?0.001), while no significant differences were found in terms of length of surgical intervention, intraoperative complications and conversions to open procedure, postoperative stay, morbidity and mortality. Patients treated with delayed surgery had a 18?% recurrency rate of biliary events, with an odds ratio of 14.13 (p?=?0.018). Same-day two-stage approach should be performed in suitable patients at the index admission, reducing overall risks, improving the patients’ quality-of-life, preventing recurrency, leading to a significant cost abatement; furthermore, this approach allows same outcomes of laparoendoscopic rendezvous, avoiding technical and organizational troubles. There is still no consensus about timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. The aim of our retrospective study is to analyze the optimal timing of surgical treatment in patients presenting concurrent choledocholithiasis, choosing to perform a sequential endoscopic plus surgical approach, introducing a same-day two-stage alternative. All cases of cholecystocholedocholithiasis occurred between January 2007 and December 2014 in “Gradenigo” Hospital (Turin—Italy) were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups, based on the timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and compared. Out of 2233 cholecystectomies performed in the mentioned time interval, have been identified 93 patients that fulfill the selection criteria. 36 patients were treated with a same-day approach, while 29 within first 72?h and 28 with delayed surgery. The overall length of stay was significantly lower in patients that were treated with a same-day approach (4.7?days), compared with other groups (p?=?0.001), while no significant differences were found in terms of length of surgical intervention, intraoperative complications and conversions to open procedure, postoperative stay, morbidity and mortality. Patients treated with delayed surgery had a 18?% recurrency rate of biliary events, with an odds ratio of 14.13 (p?=?0.018). Same-day two-stage approach should be performed in suitable patients at the index admission, reducing overall risks, improving the patients’ quality-of-life, preventing recurrency, leading to a significant cost abatement; furthermore, this approach allows same outcomes of laparoendoscopic rendezvous, avoiding technical and organizational troubles.
机译:还2015年,意大利手术学会(SIC)。还2015年,意大利手术学会(SIC)。腹腔镜胆囊切除术在内镜逆行胆管切除术治疗胆囊胆囊胆囊胆管胆管胆囊后仍然没有达成共识。我们的回顾性研究的目的是分析呈递胆总管胆管性患者的手术治疗的最佳时间,选择进行顺序内窥镜加上手术方法,引入同日两级替代方案。审查了所有胆囊胆囊胆管胆石,于2007年1月至2014年12月在“Gradenigo”医院(都灵意大利)之间发生。基于内镜逆行胆管痴呆症后胆囊切除术的时序,患者分为三组。在上述时间间隔中进行的2233次胆囊切除术,已被确定93名符合选择标准的患者。 36例患者用同日方法治疗,而在前72℃和28岁内29例,手术延迟。与其他群体相比,用同日方法(4.7天)治疗的患者的总体逗留时间明显低于(P?= 0.001),而在手术干预的长度方面没有发现显着差异,术中的并发症和转换,开放程序,术后保持,发病率和死亡率。患有延迟手术治疗的患者具有18□胆汁事件的复发性率为14.13(p≤X.018)。同日度两阶段方法应在合适的患者中进行指数入院,降低总体风险,提高患者的生活质量,防止复发性,导致大量成本减少;此外,这种方法允许剖面曲调的结术,避免技术和组织麻烦。腹腔镜胆囊切除术在内镜逆行胆管切除术治疗胆囊胆囊胆囊胆管胆管胆囊后仍然没有达成共识。我们的回顾性研究的目的是分析呈递胆总管胆管性患者的手术治疗的最佳时间,选择进行顺序内窥镜加上手术方法,引入同日两级替代方案。审查了所有胆囊胆囊胆管胆石,于2007年1月至2014年12月在“Gradenigo”医院(都灵意大利)之间发生。基于内镜逆行胆管痴呆症后胆囊切除术的时序,患者分为三组。在上述时间间隔中进行的2233次胆囊切除术,已被确定93名符合选择标准的患者。 36例患者用同日方法治疗,而在前72℃和28岁内29例,手术延迟。与其他群体相比,用同日方法(4.7天)治疗的患者的总体逗留时间明显低于(P?= 0.001),而在手术干预的长度方面没有发现显着差异,术中的并发症和转换,开放程序,术后保持,发病率和死亡率。患有延迟手术治疗的患者具有18□胆汁事件的复发性率为14.13(p≤X.018)。同日度两阶段方法应在合适的患者中进行指数入院,降低总体风险,提高患者的生活质量,防止复发性,导致大量成本减少;此外,这种方法允许剖面曲调的结术,避免技术和组织麻烦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号