首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Comparison of eddy covariance and modified Bowen ratio methods for measuring gas fluxes and implications for measuring fluxes of persistent organic pollutants
【24h】

Comparison of eddy covariance and modified Bowen ratio methods for measuring gas fluxes and implications for measuring fluxes of persistent organic pollutants

机译:涡流协方差和改性鲍氏比率测量气体势态的偏向和测量持久性有机污染物势态的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Semi-volatile persistent organic pollutants (POPs) cycle between the atmosphere and terrestrial surfaces; however measuring fluxes of POPs between the atmosphere and other media is challenging. Sampling times of hours to days are required to accurately measure trace concentrations of POPs in the atmosphere, which rules out the use of eddy covariance techniques that are used to measure gas fluxes of major air pollutants. An alternative, the modified Bowen ratio (MBR) method, has been used instead. In this study we used data from FLUXNET for CO_2 and water vapor (H_2O) to compare fluxes measured by eddy covariance to fluxes measured with the MBR method using vertical concentration gradients in air derived from averaged data that simulate the long sampling times typically required to measure POPs. When concentration gradients are strong and fluxes are unidirectional, the MBR method and the eddy covariance method agree within a factor of 3 for CO_2, and within a factor of 10 for H_2O. To remain within the range of applicability of the MBR method, field studies should be carried out under conditions such that the direction of net flux does not change during the sampling period. If that condition is met, then the performance of the MBR method is neither strongly affected by the length of sample duration nor the use of a fixed value for the transfer coefficient.
机译:半挥发性有机污染物(流行)在大气和地面之间的循环;然而,测量大气和其他介质之间的流行势倍挑战。需要数小时数小时的采样时间来准确地测量大气中的污染物污染物的痕量浓度,从而排除了用于测量主要空气污染物的气体通量的涡流协方差技术的使用。替代的是改进的鲍氏比(MBR)方法已经使用。在本研究中,我们使用来自Fluxnet的数据,用于Co_2和水蒸气(H_2O),以比较通过使用从平均数据中的空气中使用的空气中的垂直浓度梯度测量的涡流协方差测量的助熔剂来测量的助量,该方法模拟通常需要测量的长采样时间的平均数据流行。当浓度梯度是强度并且单向通量的时,MBR方法和涡流协方差方法在CO_2的3倍之间同意,并且在10倍的H_2O的10倍。为了保持在MBR方法的适用范围内,应在条件下进行现场研究,使得净磁通的方向在采样期间不会发生变化。如果满足该条件,则MBR方法的性能既不受样本持续时间长度的强烈影响,也不是使用传送系数的固定值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric chemistry and physics》 |2016年第2期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES) Stockholm University Svante Arrhenius v?g 8 114 18 Stockholm Sweden;

    Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES) Stockholm University Svante Arrhenius v?g 8 114 18 Stockholm Sweden;

    Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES) Stockholm University Svante Arrhenius v?g 8 114 18 Stockholm Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 大气科学(气象学);
  • 关键词

    Comparison; eddy; covariance;

    机译:比较;涡流;协方差;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号