首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Bone age assessment: Automated techniques coming of age?
【24h】

Bone age assessment: Automated techniques coming of age?

机译:骨龄评估:自动化技术会逐渐成熟吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bone age determination from hand radiographs is one of the oldest radiographic procedures. The first atlas was published by Poland in 1898, and to date the Greulich Pyle atlas, although it dates from 1959, is still the most commonly used method. Bone age rating is time-consuming, suffers from an unsatisfactorily high rater variability, and therefore already 25 years ago it was proposed to replace the manual rating by an automated, computerized method, a field nowadays referred to as computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). The pursuit of this goal reached a first stage of accomplishment in 1992-1996 with the presentation of several systems. However, they had limited clinical value, and efforts in CAD research were increasingly focused on lesion detection for cancer screening. It was only in 2008 that a fully-automated bone age method was presented, which appears to be clinically acceptable. In this paper we consider the requirements that should be met by an automated bone age method and review the state of the art. Integration in PACS and saving time are important factors for radiologists. But it is the validation of the methods which poses the greatest challenge, because there is no gold standard for bone age rating, and the direct comparison to manual rating is therefore not sufficient for demonstrating that manual rating can be replaced by automated rating. One needs additional studies assessing the precision of a method and its accuracy when used for adult height prediction, which serves as an objective.
机译:通过手工射线照相确定骨龄是最古老的射线照相程序之一。第一本地图集由波兰于1898年出版,迄今为止,格列利希·派尔地图集(尽管可追溯到1959年)仍然是最常用的方法。骨龄分级非常耗时,且评分者的变异性不尽人意,因此,在25年前,有人提议用一种自动化的计算机化方法来代替人工分级,如今这一领域被称为计算机辅助诊断(CAD) 。 1992-1996年,随着几个系统的介绍,实现这一目标达到了第一步。但是,它们具有有限的临床价值,并且CAD研究的工作越来越集中于用于癌症筛查的病变检测。直到2008年,才提出了一种全自动的骨龄测定方法,这在临床上似乎是可以接受的。在本文中,我们考虑了自动骨龄方法应满足的要求,并回顾了现有技术。对于放射科医师而言,PACS的集成和节省时间是重要的因素。但是,对方法的验证提出了最大的挑战,因为没有针对骨龄分级的金标准,因此与手动分级的直接比较不足以证明可以用自动分级代替手动分级。人们需要进行其他研究,以评估一种方法的准确性及其用于成人身高预测的准确性,这是一个目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号